When you send out a DV to an CA/Atty and elect arbitration, it basically can give you more options and ways to stop a judgment from happening.
(debtorboards.com/index.php/topic,10191.msg72549.html#msg72549)
You would make a statement such as this in your DV letter:
"If there is an underlying arbitration clause associated with this claim, I hereby exercise it, and waive your litigation rights to this claim, per the underlying arbitration clause."
I am just worried because I have made large cash advances a little over a year and a half ago, and I am afraid of objections from both creditor/trustee. There could possibly be other risks but they should be minimal. With that being said...
I believe that electing arbitration or sending out DV letters should not hurt or affect my BK case in any negative way, but am I correct? They should not trigger any additional attention to my accounts during my BK case? (Arbitration can be very costly to creditors, so forcing them is not going to give them more incentive to fight me harder on my BK case would it?)
Thank you in advance.
(debtorboards.com/index.php/topic,10191.msg72549.html#msg72549)
You would make a statement such as this in your DV letter:
"If there is an underlying arbitration clause associated with this claim, I hereby exercise it, and waive your litigation rights to this claim, per the underlying arbitration clause."
I am just worried because I have made large cash advances a little over a year and a half ago, and I am afraid of objections from both creditor/trustee. There could possibly be other risks but they should be minimal. With that being said...
I believe that electing arbitration or sending out DV letters should not hurt or affect my BK case in any negative way, but am I correct? They should not trigger any additional attention to my accounts during my BK case? (Arbitration can be very costly to creditors, so forcing them is not going to give them more incentive to fight me harder on my BK case would it?)
Thank you in advance.
Comment