top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Looking for insight on whether to drop it or push forward or convert to a 13.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Looking for insight on whether to drop it or push forward or convert to a 13.

    LONG post- if you get thru it, Kudos to you!

    Our attorney's office called and wanted to set a date for the UST's deposition of us.
    Whaaaat??
    Yep she said, it'll be an all day thing and she'll be requesting a boat load of other documentation.

    So we have a conference call scheduled with our attorney on Wednesday a.m. And I jump on line and check PACER.

    My thoughts:
    #1) I don't have $$$ to spend on this. An all day deposition at $300/hr. Plus the hearing.
    That's easily another $3K on top of the $3200 bill we currently have. Great. Don't have it. If this is a pissing match and the UST wants to see who's got the deeper pockets, she wins and will win every time on this issue with any debtor.

    #2)Pacer shows the UST's list of documents and witnesses they were required to provide within 14 days of the last hearing.
    Witnesses:
    • The regular trustee
    • Our prior ch 13 trustee
    (Neither bother me, in fact we actually were in contact with our ch 13 trustee office on more than one occassion when we couldn't get our prior loser attorney to return phone calls or answer questions and the trustee's office helped us navigate and call the judge's clerk to grab the attention of our 13 attorney.)
    • Financial Analyst employed by the Office of the United States Trustee
    • Any witnesses as necessary to authenticate or clarify documents
    • Any witnesses as necessary to rebut the testimony offered by the
    • Debtors or Debtors' witnesses
    (again, whatever- not worried there)
    • Mrs. XXXXXXXX's mother

    (My mother?! Probably because the Nissan that we use and pay all expenses for and pay her monthly for is financed and registered and titled to her and solely her. But really- no frigging way am I going to have my mother take time off from work, fly down ALONE (she hates to fly)to FL from CT, leaving my dad who had major shoulder surgery in January and won't have full use of his arm for a few more months, to participate in the UST's witch hunt. What the hell?!)

    #3- These documents she's providing for evidence- I guess that's where the "boat load" will come in because it says things like "Copies of the Debtors’ utility bills for the period January 1, 2010 to the present date." We provided them thru the date of filing which was June 2010. So now she wants them for the past year (same with auto insurance, etc.)

    But some of the docs make NO sense to me.
    a. Copies of credit card statements of accounts in the names of either or
    both of the Debtors for the period January 1, 2008 to the present date. (Ok...no major flashy purchases. Living expenses really. And we stopped using them in March/April 2008 so she'll see 4 months of purchases- and most were maxed out before that point.)

    b. Copies of check registers, bank statements and cancelled checks for
    all accounts of either or both of the Debtors from January 1, 2009 through the present date. (No way am I paying for 2+ years worth of cancelled checks at $20 a pop because my bank doesn't return them or include electronic images with my statements)

    h. Copies of loan and/or mortgage applications filed by the Debtors
    from January 1, 2008 to the present date. (We have no mortgage, definitely no mortgage applications. Loans?? We financed our daughter's mattress 6 months ago- one of those "provide your paystub, we give you a loan" type of things. So this doesn't seem to apply to us. )

    i. Copies of homeowner’s, renter’s, or personal articles insurance
    policies covering property of the Debtors during the period January 1, 2009 to the present date.(we have no renter's policy, and haven't had one since we started renting 3+ years ago,so what property is she looking to find insured?? Again, this doesn't seem to apply to us.)

    j. Copies of statements for 401K or other retirement accounts, including
    loan accounts, in the names of either of the Debtors for the years 2009 to the present date. (Really? We've only got $15K in a 401K- it was disclosed- and it's not even fully vested so we don't really have that much, and we could have $100K in there and it would be exempt so why is she even asking?)

    k. Copies of the transcript of the § 341 meeting and all continued meetings held in this case.(Good. Let's be sure to point out her remarks at the beginning, shall we.)

    l. Copies of transcripts of all 2004 examinations and depositions conducted in this case. (Ummm, again- no clue here. 2004? I've got nothing in 2004. Again, doesn't seem to apply to us. Does she even know this case at all?)

    q. Copies of all documents related to financial contributions to the
    household by other family members during the years 2009 through the present date.(No clue what this would be either. Unless she means the $100/month my son paid us to go towards our car insurance costs that skyrocketed once he was licensed.)

    r. Copies of all documents related to income of other immediate family
    members during the years 2009 through the present date. (Clearly she must mean my teenager's minimum wage job. As if that has any bearing on our financial status- I wish. Except he pays for his college books and the balance of his tuition at the community college- which we do not include in our education expenses because I know I can't- and he USED to pay $100 towards insurance but as of this month has his own vehicle and insurance now. Really, she wants to include the income of minor's, maybe I should tell her my little ones set up a lemonade stand on at least 2 occasions in the summer of 2009. )

    s. Business records of XXXXXXX, LLC, and any other business entities in which the Debtors currently hold or have held any ownership interest or control. (Dissolved the LLC in February 2008. DH was a contracted computer programmer before taking a job as a full time salaried employee. And, it was an LLC with no other employees or property. Again- what could she possibly find interesting here.))

    She even requested documentation of things we took the standard amount for according to our family size- like medical expenses.


    So DH wants to just throw in the towel because quite frankly we don't have the $ to pay our attorney for all of this & he has a big project going on at work with a major product release end of July/early August and his attention HAS to be on that. I would love to have my day in court with her, but I don't have an extra few grand to do so. It would almost be worth it to go into debt with the attorney to do it though.

    But after just seeing this I do laugh because we're normal people, living paycheck to paycheck, without much to show for it, and she's on a witch hunt like we have multiple properties and Swiss bank accounts! We own nothing- except for one paid for vehicle, that's worth $5k and that's debatable given it's mechanical condition! Seriously- I wanted to go visit my dad in two weeks because it's the 2nd anniversary of his brother's death and he'll be having a hard time with it (as will I). But I can't, due to lack of $- I was thinking of selling my engagement ring so that I can have the $400 to buy the plane tickets and go see him. THAT is the reality- it's nothing like the UST seems to want to cook up. Yes, DH is getting a bonus again this summer....and it's already spent. Not on fancy vacations or material items. We have one car that needs $2500 worth of repairs and the other that needs $1000 worth of repairs and a $3200+ attorney bill to pay. I know you're all jealous- We're living it large!

    So we're at a cross roads: Choices being:
    #1---Push on and subject ourselves to this and get further in debt with the attorney and possibly not get our discharge in the first place (because if the judge says the standard for rent is what it is, nothing else matters and we lose despite everything else). Honestly, her list is intimidating and I don't think I can handle her emotionally. I would probably find myself saying some not nice things on the record.

    #2---Walk away. What happens happens. Deal with the creditors that pop up when they pop up, if they pop up.

    #3---Convert to a 13. Submit all new docs and schedules (right?? is that how it's done? and would they be as of our original filing date in June 2010 or would they be as of current date?) and try for a reasonable payment. At least that pushes the crazy lady who's asking for things that don't exist (mortgage application? 2004 deposition??) out of the equation.


    Thoughts and advice would be appreciated. I'm obviously emotional about it and could use some objective opinions.
    Ch 13 filed 06/22/09. Dismissed,thankfully, 03/31/10. Ch 7 filed 06/28/10. 341 07/29/10. UST POA 08/06/10. UST mot to dismiss hearing extended to Dec...Feb...March...May...Aug. UST withdrawal of dismissal filed 05/31! DISCHARGED 07/12/2011!

    #2
    I certainly don't have any answers but wanted to offer you some support. That's a lot of 'stuff' and my husband and I are not in as deep as you yet and are weighing similar options. I am anxious to see what others say!
    Filed ch 13 12/23/10; closed 3/14; refiled ch 7 on 4/13; 341 on 5/13; reaffirmation 7/11 (denied); 7/14/11 DISCHARGED

    Comment


      #3
      And your atty is totally silent on taking this to a judge and fighting out the reasonableness of this request???

      Comment


        #4
        I suggest you get busy on gathering the info, nothing inherently unreasonable about that which they are asking.

        Sounds like you don't have much of the info, so all that needs to be done is to send a response to the UST stating so.

        I say stick it out, this looks like a routine audit...if you send the response with the docs you DO have, sometimes the UST will drop the whole thing.

        Strictly speaking, you don't need to pay your attorney to handle this, granted, probably not a good idea, but you can do this without him/her.

        Comment


          #5
          the 2004 thing would be if you had had a 2004 debtor's exam, they want the transcripts. You'd know if you had been through a 2004, I think.

          I would not spend any more money if I were you. I'd provide everything I could access for free.

          Comment


            #6
            She asked for some documentation back in Januar. We provided it.
            1. All banking records for the 2 years prior to filing. (they already had the 3 months prior to filing, but wanted the others)

            2. Utility and phone bills for the 6 months prior to filing

            3. Child care expenses for the 6 months prior to filing

            4. School expenses for the 6 months prior to filing

            5. Insurance policies and riders for the 2 term life insurance policies

            6. Any other documents relating to expenses that you think will help.



            We provided all of it. So she has a lot of this already. Then the hearing takes place and the judge sets a final evidentiary hearing date. And suddenly she wants more. Some of it I have no idea where's she getting it from. The " documentation of support from family members"? The "2004 deposition"? Is this just stuff she's asking if it exists, because I am seriously wondering if she's getting our case mixed up with another? WHY utility, auto insurance and medical bills TO DATE? Could it be that she wants to see if we're suddenly rolling in the dough since we filed a year ago? Why are some items requested as of Jan 1, 2009 (we filed June 2010), and some Jan 1 2008, and some open-ended...like the "Copies of all leases to which the Debtors are a party"...in what time period? We've moved twice in 3 years so I guess she wants all 3 leases? And there's "Copies of all documents related to the Debtors’ federal tax liability and payment obligations for prior years’ federal income taxes." To what year? Going back to when we were first married? Going back to the year we first owed taxes when DH was first self-employed, in 2001? I just don't know that I have the emotional stamina to go thru all this. Especially if a judge looks at it and says "nope, rent standard is $1,060 for a family of 5+ so that's all I'm allowing". The rest will be wasted trees and time. I definitely don't have the money for it and risking it without an attorney seems illogical since I have no idea what some of this stuff is and why she thinks it should/does/may exist. Oh, and the majority of this stuff doesn't even have anything to do with her listed reasons in her motion to dismiss which was filed back last August! She stated rental cost over the US standard, over withholding taxes, a utility line item that was $28 more than the IRS standard, and that we didn't list my mom's car payment in the ownership expense and we should have done so. That's it. Suddenly my POA and motion to dismiss is about everything and not just those items??
            Ch 13 filed 06/22/09. Dismissed,thankfully, 03/31/10. Ch 7 filed 06/28/10. 341 07/29/10. UST POA 08/06/10. UST mot to dismiss hearing extended to Dec...Feb...March...May...Aug. UST withdrawal of dismissal filed 05/31! DISCHARGED 07/12/2011!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by dontburnthep View Post
              the 2004 thing would be if you had had a 2004 debtor's exam, they want the transcripts. You'd know if you had been through a 2004, I think.

              I would not spend any more money if I were you. I'd provide everything I could access for free.
              Yeah, definitely no debtor's exam in 2004. Wasn't living in FL and wasn't financially in trouble in 2004! Why on earth would she think there was such a thing???
              Ch 13 filed 06/22/09. Dismissed,thankfully, 03/31/10. Ch 7 filed 06/28/10. 341 07/29/10. UST POA 08/06/10. UST mot to dismiss hearing extended to Dec...Feb...March...May...Aug. UST withdrawal of dismissal filed 05/31! DISCHARGED 07/12/2011!

              Comment


                #8
                A 2004 exam has nothing to do with the year 2004. It is the name for a Debtor's Exam based on Rule 2004 of Title 11.

                TITLE 11 App. > FEDERAL > PART II > Rule 2004
                Rule 2004. Examination

                (a) Examination on Motion. On motion of any party in interest, the court may order the examination of any entity.

                (b) Scope of Examination. The examination of an entity under this rule or of the debtor under § 343 of the Code may relate only to the acts, conduct, or property or to the liabilities and financial condition of the debtor, or to any matter which may affect the administration of the debtor’s estate, or to the debtor’s right to a discharge. In a family farmer’s debt adjustment case under chapter 12, an individual’s debt adjustment case under chapter 13, or a reorganization case under chapter 11 of the Code, other than for the reorganization of a railroad, the examination may also relate to the operation of any business and the desirability of its continuance, the source of any money or property acquired or to be acquired by the debtor for purposes of consummating a plan and the consideration given or offered therefor, and any other matter relevant to the case or to the formulation of a plan.

                (c) Compelling Attendance and Production of Documents. The attendance of an entity for examination and for the production of documents, whether the examination is to be conducted within or without the district in which the case is pending, may be compelled as provided in Rule 9016 for the attendance of a witness at a hearing or trial. As an officer of the court, an attorney may issue and sign a subpoena on behalf of the court for the district in which the examination is to be held if the attorney is admitted to practice in that court or in the court in which the case is pending.

                (d) Time and Place of Examination of Debtor. The court may for cause shown and on terms as it may impose order the debtor to be examined under this rule at any time or place it designates, whether within or without the district wherein the case is pending.

                (e) Mileage. An entity other than a debtor shall not be required to attend as a witness unless lawful mileage and witness fee for one day’s attendance shall be first tendered. If the debtor resides more than 100 miles from the place of examination when required to appear for an examination under this rule, the mileage allowed by law to a witness shall be tendered for any distance more than 100 miles from the debtor’s residence at the date of the filing of the first petition commencing a case under the Code or the residence at the time the debtor is required to appear for the examination, whichever is the lesser.


                If you had a PayPal fund for your legal fees, I would donate so you could trounce the stupid UST.

                Then of course she would want to see all the details of your PayPal account. Ugh.
                ~~ Filed Over Median Income Chapter 7: 12/17/2010 ~~ 341 Held: 1/12/2011 ~~ Discharged: 03/16/2011 ~~
                Not an attorney - just an opinionated woman.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by dontburnthep View Post
                  the 2004 thing would be if you had had a 2004 debtor's exam, they want the transcripts. You'd know if you had been through a 2004, I think.
                  I agree. If you have no idea that you had a 2004 Exam, then you have not had one. We have. You truly would know if you had one. This list sounds like a standard form. Simply answer what you can, and what you cannot, mark 'Unknown' or 'Not Applicable' as appropriate.

                  ETA: Posts #6, 7, 8, came in before my answer to dontburnthep, got logged. So I apologize if what I said is irrelevant now.
                  Last edited by AngelinaCat; 05-23-2011, 05:10 PM. Reason: Added the last sentance.
                  "To go bravely forward is to invite a miracle."

                  "Worry is the darkroom where negatives are formed."

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by olivies View Post
                    We provided all of it. So she has a lot of this already. Then the hearing takes place and the judge sets a final evidentiary hearing date. And suddenly she wants more. Some of it I have no idea where's she getting it from. The " documentation of support from family members"? The "2004 deposition"? 2004 is a Federal Court Rule allowing the court to order an examination of a debtor's financial condition. Is this just stuff she's asking if it exists, because I am seriously wondering if she's getting our case mixed up with another? She probably uses the same list for all cases. Produce what you have. WHY utility, auto insurance and medical bills TO DATE? To confirm your expenses have been what is stated in your schedule J. The request for utility bills is directly related to a stated reason for her motion to dismiss. Could it be that she wants to see if we're suddenly rolling in the dough since we filed a year ago? perhaps. And to make sure you aren't hiding assets or sources of income. Why are some items requested as of Jan 1, 2009 (we filed June 2010), and some Jan 1 2008, and some open-ended...like the "Copies of all leases to which the Debtors are a party"...in what time period? "to which Debtors are a party" seems to mean any lease to which you are currently a party, regardless of when you entered into it. We've moved twice in 3 years so I guess she wants all 3 leases? You might as well have them all ready And there's "Copies of all documents related to the Debtors’ federal tax liability and payment obligations for prior years’ federal income taxes." To what year? Sounds to me like whatever year you still owe tax for. Going back to when we were first married? Going back to the year we first owed taxes when DH was first self-employed, in 2001? I just don't know that I have the emotional stamina to go thru all this. Take a deep breath. You can only provide what you have or can get. If you don't understand any request, ask your attorney. Especially if a judge looks at it and says "nope, rent standard is $1,060 for a family of 5+ so that's all I'm allowing". The rest will be wasted trees and time. I definitely don't have the money for it and risking it without an attorney seems illogical since I have no idea what some of this stuff is and why she thinks it should/does/may exist. Your attorney could advise you on what to bring, but not attend the day long deposition.
                    Maybe she can be sure to be available on that day so you can call her if anything comes up you need to ask her questions about
                    Oh, and the majority of this stuff doesn't even have anything to do with her listed reasons in her motion to dismiss which was filed back last August! She stated rental cost over the US standard, over withholding taxes, a utility line item that was $28 more than the IRS standard, and that we didn't list my mom's car payment in the ownership expense and we should have done so. That's it. Suddenly my POA and motion to dismiss is about everything and not just those items?? Is it possible that her motion to dismiss was based on a very broad totality of circumstances and then whent on to list specific areas without limiting the broader objection?
                    Responding to a document request can be overwhelming. Take one item at a time and provide whatever you have. If you don't have something and the cost of getting it is burdonsome, tell your attorney. If something doesn't apply to you, just say so and be glad that is one less document you have to provide. If you already provided the requested information, ask your attorney if you have to provide it again or whether you can just state what you already provided that is responsive to that request.

                    Ask your attorney if your mother can appear by telephone or answer interrogatories (written questions) instead of making a personal appearance.

                    It seems a shame to throw in the towel at this point. You decided to fight for the Chap 7, right? You made that decision based on the advice of your new attorney, right? Don't let your panic in the face of this overwhelming list change your mind. Start with one item without thinking about the others. Get together whatever documents are responsive, then go to the next item.

                    You can get through this!
                    LadyInTheRed is in the black!
                    Filed Chap 13 April 2010. Discharged May 2015.
                    $143,000 in debt discharged for $36,500, including attorneys fees. Money well spent!

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I'm so sorry you're having to endure all of this olives... that just sucks.

                      FWIW, if it were me and we were being subjected to all of this... I'd probably roll over and just do the 13 and be done with it. The questions you need to ask yourself are:

                      - is it worth the added stress to fight all of this?

                      - .....worth added fees?

                      - .... worth the time?

                      - how much of a Ch. 13 plan payment are we talking about here vs. the cost to fight it all? You're going on 2 years since you org. filed... thats quite a long time to deal with the constant stress of BK / debt issues.

                      Write it all down in a list - Pro's / Con's format (keep it simple) and then figure it out from there. For me... I'd rather deal with 5 years of possible payments and be done with it than another year possibly before knowing if confirmed. You've pretty much leaned towards the same if you go back and read your post(s).

                      Bottom line... is it worth it to you to fight it? That only you can answer

                      Comment


                        #12
                        DH had an interesting phone call with our attorney today!

                        Apparently the hearing this month stirred up a bit of a hornet's nest. The judge agreed with our attorney that rental standard for 5 people should not be the same for 8 people any more than it should be for 20 people. The UST argued, the standard is firm, it is what it is.

                        The situation, without getting into too much detail, is that the judge said our case meets the criteria for a test case. DH said our attorney explained "there was some Supreme Court ruling this past year, about people taking standards for car payments when they had a car and no payment"... at this point I laughed, because having more "free time" in my day I know exactly what he's talking about (Ransom). Apparently our judge feels that judges have authority to make the decision whether a line item is reasonable or not and a different amount should be considered. The UST doesn't. They would like to test this out. The judge thinks we make a good test case. The UST does not, because we have 6 kids and knows that sympathies would lean towards us in an appeal. So the UST is trying to find ways to back off and not have to stick with the POA and motion to dismiss that don't involve having the judge make a decision which would make us the test case which they would have to appeal.

                        DH and I are on the same page. Wow - glad that our case can help bring to light some inadequacies in the bankruptcy code, but on the same hand we don't really want the scrutiny of being a test case and having this dragged out and being the topic of interest in a pissing match basically. GOOD to know the judge sides with us, but it's bad to know that if he makes that ruling the UST has plans to bring it up a level and appeal it.

                        The UST has agreed to be conferenced in on a phone call with us tomorrow to discuss some documents we provided, instead of us going in for a deposition. And she asked that we have some figures/receipts available as to what our current monthly expenses are, why exactly I have no idea. Keeping my fingers crossed that the BEST case scenario comes true tomorrow, and that the UST files a "motion to dismiss is inappropriate" after our conference.
                        Ch 13 filed 06/22/09. Dismissed,thankfully, 03/31/10. Ch 7 filed 06/28/10. 341 07/29/10. UST POA 08/06/10. UST mot to dismiss hearing extended to Dec...Feb...March...May...Aug. UST withdrawal of dismissal filed 05/31! DISCHARGED 07/12/2011!

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Fingers crossed for you!!

                          Too bad you can't drop in a snide comment about how she should be more concerned about how her PP comment would be taken if it was brought up in an appeal. Ugh... I so dislike this woman.
                          ~~ Filed Over Median Income Chapter 7: 12/17/2010 ~~ 341 Held: 1/12/2011 ~~ Discharged: 03/16/2011 ~~
                          Not an attorney - just an opinionated woman.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by olivies View Post
                            The UST has agreed to be conferenced in on a phone call with us tomorrow to discuss some documents we provided, instead of us going in for a deposition. And she asked that we have some figures/receipts available as to what our current monthly expenses are, why exactly I have no idea. Keeping my fingers crossed that the BEST case scenario comes true tomorrow, and that the UST files a "motion to dismiss is inappropriate" after our conference.
                            It's possible that the UST is just checking to see if circumstances have changed since the time you filed. A lot can change in almost a year. Hopefully once she hears the information you have for her, she'll back down and eat a little crow.

                            We're all pulling for you and I know I'll be thinking of you tomorrow as you go through this conference call. Here's to the BEST outcome for you and your family!!
                            Filed pro se, made it through the 341, discharged, Closed!!!

                            Comment


                              #15
                              woooow. what division in fla court are you in for this? that is some ordeal...best of luck!
                              Filed Ch 7. Jan 14th 2011. 341 Feb. 24th 2011. DISCHARGED April 26th 2011. Closed May 10th, 2011. Huge weight off our shoulders! Scores as of 5/14/11 : TU-639, EQ-642, EXP-602

                              Comment

                              bottom Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X