Originally posted by Pandora
View Post
I don't mean to be inconsistent -- it just seems with the car recently purchased but the title not being filed, I still have some options as to how the Subaru is/is not included in my bankruptcy. With the Subaru, everyone has said it is such a major problem to have my mom provide financing -- so to avoid that problem I am looking at ways for the whole car thing to be between my son and mom until after my bankruptcy, at which point I will begin to repay my mom for the loan. Does that make sense? Then it seems the Subaru would be 'outside' of the bankruptcy, not causing a red flag for the trustee because the car will be between my mom and son, therefore no 'loan' to me. I will simply be on the honor system to repay the $15K to her after the bankruptcy is over. It seems to me that would make the 'family loan' red flag and the 'new debt' red flag disappear in a completely legal and above-board way. It then becomes my choice after the bankruptcy to pay my mom back for the money she paid for the car. (Btw, my son will pay for part of the car -- he is selling a gun he owns and will give that to my mom -- about $2000 -- plus he is hoping to get a better paying job this summer and will make small payments then as well). I hope that does not add to the inconsistency?
Again, although I was considering getting myself a lower mileage car before bankruptcy (using a financing company with my mom getting the loan), when my son's car was deemed unsafe for daily use that plan changed. I don't know if I would have ended up getting the car for myself (without the impetus) or not -- I had put it off for 3 months already. And yes, I was thinking that having a car payment would not hurt my numbers (and give perhaps some comfort), but it definitely would not have been necessary once I found out my tenant would be leaving next month. I had also thought that if something went terribly wrong and I was pushed into a Chapter 13, it would be better to already have a vehicle than to have to purchase one while in the 13.
As to the tenant -- she IS a renter, not a roommate. We have a contract. She gave me her 30 day notice last week, as she is buying a house. In the contract, we specified she could give 30 days notice, although really she is only leaving about 12 days before her 12 month contract would be up anyway. I'm not sure how that got confused -- my only question with the basement is whether or not it will raise a red flag if I do not re-rent the basement before the bankruptcy, since I would like to re-rent it eventually. As to my income, I AM counting the rent she paid in my 6 month look-back -- but I am not currently counting it in my 'future income', since she is leaving in a few weeks (and I hopefully won't file before May). Is that still confusing? I don't remember saying she was a roommate, but it is entirely possible I said something confusing -- especially considering the new rush of anxiety the whole car debacle has brought on!
Comment