top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Updates on progress towards Chapter 7 -- and questions/input requested?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Pandora View Post
    I dont believe an attorney will review paperwork you hand them - ask them questions - then you go file it pro-se unless you have a friend who's an attorney experienced in Ch 7 & 13 Bk. Generally you consult with an attorney (free or paid), run quick numbers (i.e., yearly income to quick means test based on that #), give a generalized figure of debts owed, asset values, and then you get a ballpark best "guesstimate" of either Ch. 7 or 13. You dont get to the actual paperwork (schedules, etc) until after you've hired your attorney, at which that point you fill it all out and then they'll go over it. Corrections will be made accordingly prior to filing.

    Or at least thats how its worked for us...

    I think the bigger picture that is being looked at is that one moment you're stating things are loans and are to be paid inside of your BK, then you're turning it around in the next sentence (sorry... ) same goes for your renter - either you are the landlord and are collecting rents or they are a roommate, splitting the bills/expenses equallly, but you cant keep switching it up to suit the situation or issue that someone else questions or may see an issue with. Thats why I included Des's link on collecting rent and while it does pertain to rental properties, you either have a lease agreement with your renter that states $650 per month for XX months - OR - they are your roommate and things will be counted differently. A whole 'nuther issue in itself.

    I cant speak for anyone else on here - only myself - and in trying to help you possibly see areas where a trustee or even a lawyer would have issue. I'm not a lawyer, I'm not even a paralegal - hell I'm just a SAHM who hates to see people get themselves in a position they may not be able to get out of. Life is hard enough as it is without adding additional stress to it.

    I have no other suggestions for ya Silly - I hope it all works out the way you want it to hun. Keeping my fingers crossed for you.
    You could be right about the attorney, but I am going to try to find someone who will do it this way. I just don't see the point of paying someone to fill out forms I have already filled out. Check the figures and amounts used, sure!

    I don't mean to be inconsistent -- it just seems with the car recently purchased but the title not being filed, I still have some options as to how the Subaru is/is not included in my bankruptcy. With the Subaru, everyone has said it is such a major problem to have my mom provide financing -- so to avoid that problem I am looking at ways for the whole car thing to be between my son and mom until after my bankruptcy, at which point I will begin to repay my mom for the loan. Does that make sense? Then it seems the Subaru would be 'outside' of the bankruptcy, not causing a red flag for the trustee because the car will be between my mom and son, therefore no 'loan' to me. I will simply be on the honor system to repay the $15K to her after the bankruptcy is over. It seems to me that would make the 'family loan' red flag and the 'new debt' red flag disappear in a completely legal and above-board way. It then becomes my choice after the bankruptcy to pay my mom back for the money she paid for the car. (Btw, my son will pay for part of the car -- he is selling a gun he owns and will give that to my mom -- about $2000 -- plus he is hoping to get a better paying job this summer and will make small payments then as well). I hope that does not add to the inconsistency?

    Again, although I was considering getting myself a lower mileage car before bankruptcy (using a financing company with my mom getting the loan), when my son's car was deemed unsafe for daily use that plan changed. I don't know if I would have ended up getting the car for myself (without the impetus) or not -- I had put it off for 3 months already. And yes, I was thinking that having a car payment would not hurt my numbers (and give perhaps some comfort), but it definitely would not have been necessary once I found out my tenant would be leaving next month. I had also thought that if something went terribly wrong and I was pushed into a Chapter 13, it would be better to already have a vehicle than to have to purchase one while in the 13.

    As to the tenant -- she IS a renter, not a roommate. We have a contract. She gave me her 30 day notice last week, as she is buying a house. In the contract, we specified she could give 30 days notice, although really she is only leaving about 12 days before her 12 month contract would be up anyway. I'm not sure how that got confused -- my only question with the basement is whether or not it will raise a red flag if I do not re-rent the basement before the bankruptcy, since I would like to re-rent it eventually. As to my income, I AM counting the rent she paid in my 6 month look-back -- but I am not currently counting it in my 'future income', since she is leaving in a few weeks (and I hopefully won't file before May). Is that still confusing? I don't remember saying she was a roommate, but it is entirely possible I said something confusing -- especially considering the new rush of anxiety the whole car debacle has brought on!

    Comment


      #32
      A thought.. how much will this lawyer charge per hour? (And how detailed will they want to be, as you are not filing through them, so they cannot be liable for your goofs?)

      Look at it this way. You fill out all the forms. You go in, and an hour at $150.00 per hour turns into two hours. You don't hear what you want to hear ("this is great! file it!"), and have to revise. And go back- at $150.00 and hour.

      You file. Run into problems. Now you have to hire your attorney to defend you. Now the charge is $250.00 an hour for meeting with the trustee, or whatever the attorney charges for working on a case vs. advising in office.

      Find a lawyer, give them $1500, filing fees. Take their advice! Maybe the attorney will lay out for you exactly how to proceed so you do not lose anything!

      Do you want a ch. 7? Well, what if you file pro se, and the trustee says, no it's 13 for you. And gets into your business in a very real and intrusive way. You can't back out. You can't argue or disagree. It's the trustees call. Now, you are stuck, right? Or, you have to find an attorney to help you work out the mess. ($$) And it probably is not entirely fixable, in a way that is advantageous to you.

      I am a person with questions myself, not an attorney or in any way a legal adviser of any sort. This post is just my regular-person 2 cents. I have to say, though, that if I had the issues you are describing, I'd be terrified of proceeding on my own. I'd think twice about acting pro se on a no-assett BK! I do know that any time your family is involvede in any of your loans, etc., you are closely looked at. Scary.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by new2B View Post
        A thought.. how much will this lawyer charge per hour? (And how detailed will they want to be, as you are not filing through them, so they cannot be liable for your goofs?)

        Look at it this way. You fill out all the forms. You go in, and an hour at $150.00 per hour turns into two hours. You don't hear what you want to hear ("this is great! file it!"), and have to revise. And go back- at $150.00 and hour.

        You file. Run into problems. Now you have to hire your attorney to defend you. Now the charge is $250.00 an hour for meeting with the trustee, or whatever the attorney charges for working on a case vs. advising in office.

        Find a lawyer, give them $1500, filing fees. Take their advice! Maybe the attorney will lay out for you exactly how to proceed so you do not lose anything!

        Do you want a ch. 7? Well, what if you file pro se, and the trustee says, no it's 13 for you. And gets into your business in a very real and intrusive way. You can't back out. You can't argue or disagree. It's the trustees call. Now, you are stuck, right? Or, you have to find an attorney to help you work out the mess. ($$) And it probably is not entirely fixable, in a way that is advantageous to you.

        I am a person with questions myself, not an attorney or in any way a legal adviser of any sort. This post is just my regular-person 2 cents. I have to say, though, that if I had the issues you are describing, I'd be terrified of proceeding on my own. I'd think twice about acting pro se on a no-assett BK! I do know that any time your family is involvede in any of your loans, etc., you are closely looked at. Scary.
        New2B --

        Thanks for responding. I have done extensive research and feel I could file pro se in many instances -- BUT! -- I am leaning more and more towards using an attorney. There is a good chance I will use an attorney and say afterwards that I could have done it on my own, but I guess it's better safe than sorry, right? I still have cash from my tax return (waiting to end of month to spend it, to be sure no more bit expenses pop up) -- I can use it to pay for the attorney. <bleah> Now the pain of trying to find a good one....

        Comment


          #34
          Just an update, though more input is appreciated. My tenant in the basement who is buying a house -- she emailed me today to let me know the house she wanted fell through, and she will be staying (assuming I extend the 12 month rental agreement). I am inclined to extend the contract, though that does mean I have to put the $650 back in my numbers -- I think it will still work.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by sillywalks View Post
            New2B --

            Thanks for responding. I have done extensive research and feel I could file pro se in many instances -- BUT! -- I am leaning more and more towards using an attorney. There is a good chance I will use an attorney and say afterwards that I could have done it on my own, but I guess it's better safe than sorry, right? I still have cash from my tax return (waiting to end of month to spend it, to be sure no more bit expenses pop up) -- I can use it to pay for the attorney. <bleah> Now the pain of trying to find a good one....
            ...better safe than sorry.

            1) For me, I thought first about settling. Then I realized that not everybody would settle with me. Far from it! So, ok, I'm going to have to defend a suit or two. Allright! I'm pumped! I am a researching fool.


            2) I realized, I will spend the next 10 months of my life totally focused on defending myself. Every spare minute. I will become a pro se lawyer first, everything else second.


            3) Then I think about the realities: I will settle, for a real pittance, with some; for more than I can realistically afford (which is a pittance) with a few; and then will spend every waking minute dealing with two. Hours and hours, months and months.


            4)


            5) So I begin to think. Why am I doing this to myself? I will have no life. The amount of money I will pay an experienced attorney to deall with this is a PITTANCE compared to what money, and, hear me carefully, TIME I will spend going the other way. My credit is shot either way. It may improve after BK. I am done the day I retain my attorney.

            6) Retain! Call my creditors, let them know, they wish me luck (in most cases. And calls stop. And worrying about them stops.) All my questions sre being answered at the attny's office, which would be of great benefit to you in your situation: suddenly, you have an expert on call.

            7) I DO suggest interviewing your attorney choices very carefully. Pay attention to your instincts. Get recommendations.

            8) Once you are done choosing and retaining your attorney, your life is your own again in some crucial ways.

            And remember, I am a fairly simple case. I could have filed pro se. I DIDN'T, and I am happy.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by new2B View Post
              ...better safe than sorry.

              1) For me, I thought first about settling. Then I realized that not everybody would settle with me. Far from it! So, ok, I'm going to have to defend a suit or two. Allright! I'm pumped! I am a researching fool.


              2) I realized, I will spend the next 10 months of my life totally focused on defending myself. Every spare minute. I will become a pro se lawyer first, everything else second.


              3) Then I think about the realities: I will settle, for a real pittance, with some; for more than I can realistically afford (which is a pittance) with a few; and then will spend every waking minute dealing with two. Hours and hours, months and months.


              4)


              5) So I begin to think. Why am I doing this to myself? I will have no life. The amount of money I will pay an experienced attorney to deall with this is a PITTANCE compared to what money, and, hear me carefully, TIME I will spend going the other way. My credit is shot either way. It may improve after BK. I am done the day I retain my attorney.

              6) Retain! Call my creditors, let them know, they wish me luck (in most cases. And calls stop. And worrying about them stops.) All my questions sre being answered at the attny's office, which would be of great benefit to you in your situation: suddenly, you have an expert on call.

              7) I DO suggest interviewing your attorney choices very carefully. Pay attention to your instincts. Get recommendations.

              8) Once you are done choosing and retaining your attorney, your life is your own again in some crucial ways.

              And remember, I am a fairly simple case. I could have filed pro se. I DIDN'T, and I am happy.
              You are wise for one so young! <g> I think I have thrown in the towel and will commence searching for an attorney. I thought I had found one, but he will not work out after all. Back to the search!

              I have to admit, I love learning and enjoy researching (in fact, I am hoping to go back for my Doctorate in 2013 -- one more reason I am hoping to avoid Chapter 13!). But, you (and the many others suggesting using an attorney) are ultimately right -- I have better things to spend my time on right now, including studying for the GRE (again). At least I feel like I understand enough that I will be able to communicate intelligently with my attorney to be sure we are on the same page.

              I've set the ball rolling towards setting up initial consultations, ugh, and hopefully I will find someone fairly quickly so I can resolve the Subaru situation.

              Thanks! Glad the attorney worked out for you!

              Comment


                #37
                sw, LOL.

                Research that attorney like you'd research your favorite puchase (shoeselectronicswineEDUCATIONvacationssportsequip ment) anything you are passionate about. Yes, YOU can do it- but why should you. The attorney needs to prove themself to you. Not you to them.

                Best to you- GL.

                Comment

                bottom Ad Widget

                Collapse
                Working...
                X