My case is pretty complicated so I feel that I should hire an attorney.
I have researched for a good attorney through google, avvo, martindale etc. and I think I have found a really good match for me. I am really dead set on having him be my attorney (**even though I have never spoken, or consulted with him yet.), but I feel I may be too favorably biased and I want to be objective with my case so I found another really great attorney for a second opinion.
First do you guys think a second opinion would be best for me?
And if so, should I see my best choice attorney last?
(To be honest, I just want to see him first and not even see another attorney but I know I have to think objectively since my case seems really complicated and I'd feel much more comfortable with a second opinion. I feel that there is just too much at stake.)
Thanks in advance.
I have researched for a good attorney through google, avvo, martindale etc. and I think I have found a really good match for me. I am really dead set on having him be my attorney (**even though I have never spoken, or consulted with him yet.), but I feel I may be too favorably biased and I want to be objective with my case so I found another really great attorney for a second opinion.
First do you guys think a second opinion would be best for me?
And if so, should I see my best choice attorney last?
(To be honest, I just want to see him first and not even see another attorney but I know I have to think objectively since my case seems really complicated and I'd feel much more comfortable with a second opinion. I feel that there is just too much at stake.)
Thanks in advance.
Comment