What do you mean by "blow out" a 13.
The courts would simply say that your unsecured creditors should not suffer so you can maintain investment properties.
In any event, if your a non-consumer case, your a non-consumer case. Your disposable income will not matter. But as with most high income chap 7, the issue is always assets. Getting you qualified for chap 7 (assuming non-consumer) is easy, protecting assets, that is a different story. It is rare for a high-income filers to have a no-asset cases, there is always something and when push comes to shove, despite all the *****ing and moaning, it more cost effective and less risky to surrender at risk assets than to fight a losing war to try and keep them.
The courts would simply say that your unsecured creditors should not suffer so you can maintain investment properties.
In any event, if your a non-consumer case, your a non-consumer case. Your disposable income will not matter. But as with most high income chap 7, the issue is always assets. Getting you qualified for chap 7 (assuming non-consumer) is easy, protecting assets, that is a different story. It is rare for a high-income filers to have a no-asset cases, there is always something and when push comes to shove, despite all the *****ing and moaning, it more cost effective and less risky to surrender at risk assets than to fight a losing war to try and keep them.
Comment