I've read and re-read the sticky on this topic, so I'm not understanding at all why my attorney (we met briefly for the first time today) would say to reaffirm the mortgage when everything I come across says not to. He explained it, but we talked about a lot of things, so I can't remember everything! Here's the scenario:
We live in Oregon. I'm married but filing alone. Our only joint debt is the house and HELOC. We are current and will stay current on both. After reading here, my husband and I had decided I would not reaffirm on the mortgage or HELOC. Today my attorney advised me to reaffirm on the first mortgage but not the HELOC. I understand his reasoning on not reaffirming the second, but not the reason for doing so on the first. Can anyone explain to me why he might suggest that?
Another thing. He said that when a BK is filed, often statements stop coming and/or automatic payments stop being withdrawn. I understand why that would apply to me, but wouldn't my husband still get that communication, since he is on the loans and not filing?
We live in Oregon. I'm married but filing alone. Our only joint debt is the house and HELOC. We are current and will stay current on both. After reading here, my husband and I had decided I would not reaffirm on the mortgage or HELOC. Today my attorney advised me to reaffirm on the first mortgage but not the HELOC. I understand his reasoning on not reaffirming the second, but not the reason for doing so on the first. Can anyone explain to me why he might suggest that?
Another thing. He said that when a BK is filed, often statements stop coming and/or automatic payments stop being withdrawn. I understand why that would apply to me, but wouldn't my husband still get that communication, since he is on the loans and not filing?
Comment