I have a car loan with a CU. I also have a Signature Loan and a Visa with them as well.
The car loan is current but the SL & Visa are about 6 months behind. They sent me an email message stating that they'd like to make a settlement offer. I called them to see what kind of settlement offer they wanted to make--I got her VM so I don't know any terms/amounts yet. But I do have a few concerns.
The car loan balance is 21k, SL balance is 800 and Visa balance is 10k.
The SL & Visa are cross-collateralized to the car loan otherwise, I'd tell them to pound sand because I'm still unemployed.
My intention all along (since deciding that I'm going to have to go bk) has been to redeem the car loan because the car's value is only 16k. I want to keep it because I bought it new and know it's been well cared for. Who knows what I'd be getting if I were to go buy a used car.
1) If the settlement offer is low enough that I could actually afford to pay it in one lump sum (which I doubt), how would that be seen if/when I do file bk? The SL & Visa are both supposedly unsecured. But then the paperwork has the cross-collateralization clause and the car loan paperwork indicates that it secures "any other debt [I] have with [them]". So would a trustee see it as preferential treatment for an unsecured creditor? Or as me paying on a secured debt?
2) If the settlement offer is too high for a lump sum and they agree to roll it into the car loan (which I'm sure is the only way they'd accept a payment plan) would that later prevent me from redeeming the car if I should still want to do so? The reason I mention this second option is that when I first told them that I had lost my job and might have trouble making my payments, they wanted to roll the SL, Visa and car loan into one new car loan. I said no because at the time, I didn't understand about this cross-collateralization clause and didn't want to convert unsecured debt into secured debt.
TIA!
The car loan is current but the SL & Visa are about 6 months behind. They sent me an email message stating that they'd like to make a settlement offer. I called them to see what kind of settlement offer they wanted to make--I got her VM so I don't know any terms/amounts yet. But I do have a few concerns.
The car loan balance is 21k, SL balance is 800 and Visa balance is 10k.
The SL & Visa are cross-collateralized to the car loan otherwise, I'd tell them to pound sand because I'm still unemployed.
My intention all along (since deciding that I'm going to have to go bk) has been to redeem the car loan because the car's value is only 16k. I want to keep it because I bought it new and know it's been well cared for. Who knows what I'd be getting if I were to go buy a used car.
1) If the settlement offer is low enough that I could actually afford to pay it in one lump sum (which I doubt), how would that be seen if/when I do file bk? The SL & Visa are both supposedly unsecured. But then the paperwork has the cross-collateralization clause and the car loan paperwork indicates that it secures "any other debt [I] have with [them]". So would a trustee see it as preferential treatment for an unsecured creditor? Or as me paying on a secured debt?
2) If the settlement offer is too high for a lump sum and they agree to roll it into the car loan (which I'm sure is the only way they'd accept a payment plan) would that later prevent me from redeeming the car if I should still want to do so? The reason I mention this second option is that when I first told them that I had lost my job and might have trouble making my payments, they wanted to roll the SL, Visa and car loan into one new car loan. I said no because at the time, I didn't understand about this cross-collateralization clause and didn't want to convert unsecured debt into secured debt.
TIA!
Comment