So . . some of you may remember we found out at our 341 we wouldn't be able to use federal exemptions, and would have to use the ones for the state of Maine. This put us in a position to lose our nearly $6k in savings. Well today, FINALLY, our lawyer is actually filing for us in the state of maine (because we had until monday to contest the trustee telling us to turn over all of our money, as he filed his report with us claiming the state we're in now and not maine). . . so anyway, just completed the schedules and our attorney had talked to an attorney in Maine -- and this attorney said there is no precedence for the $6k unused homestead exemption being used to cover savings. This is what it says:
Unused homestead to $6,000 or unused total for tools of trade, personal injury recoveries, or household goods & furnishings, clothing, appliances, books, animals, crops, and musical instruments.
But the attorney suggested we try, because he's never actually seen it done, someone trying to protect cash, that is. Is there a disadvantage to at least trying? We would have to go in front of the judge -- any idea what he would ask? Is this a shot in the dark anyway? Is it worth it pushing our bankruptcy out? If it worked and these savings were protected, we'd go from an asset to a no asset case. TIA!
Unused homestead to $6,000 or unused total for tools of trade, personal injury recoveries, or household goods & furnishings, clothing, appliances, books, animals, crops, and musical instruments.
But the attorney suggested we try, because he's never actually seen it done, someone trying to protect cash, that is. Is there a disadvantage to at least trying? We would have to go in front of the judge -- any idea what he would ask? Is this a shot in the dark anyway? Is it worth it pushing our bankruptcy out? If it worked and these savings were protected, we'd go from an asset to a no asset case. TIA!
Comment