Regarding lawsuits and subsequent judgements from CC companies, when they are discharged in the Ch 7, is there any disadvantage to having them on the credit report compared to not?
Basically, if you have a Ch 7 and no judgements prior to the bk, is that 'better' than a Ch 7 with judgements prior? Or is it 6 of one, 1/2 dozen of the other since it is all discharged with the BK?
I read something somewhere about it being bad if there are judgements since they still show on your report after the bk, just as IIB...but it seems to me that the BK is like the nuclear bomb on your credit report that sort of renders things like late pays and judgements less relevant, so long as they are all PRIOR to bk.
thoughts?
Basically, if you have a Ch 7 and no judgements prior to the bk, is that 'better' than a Ch 7 with judgements prior? Or is it 6 of one, 1/2 dozen of the other since it is all discharged with the BK?
I read something somewhere about it being bad if there are judgements since they still show on your report after the bk, just as IIB...but it seems to me that the BK is like the nuclear bomb on your credit report that sort of renders things like late pays and judgements less relevant, so long as they are all PRIOR to bk.
thoughts?
Comment