Beeheery, what if you paid him rent with utilities included for several months? Then he'd simply be your landlord (since he owns the home). You'd have a negative dmi, but many people who file ch 7 seem to have a negative dmi.
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
roommate question
Collapse
X
-
more roommate confusion
Found this, the way I read it is that you have to count all the roommate pays (regularly) toward household expenses as income. But not the rest of roommates income.
Also, US Trustee position is to use IRS definition of dependent but BK courts are not agreeing, using the Census definition of household instead ("heads on the beds" everyone who lives in the housing-unit)
Just in case things aren't confused enough....
Tom in ColoCh7 filed 5/12/2010.....341 meeting 6/30/2010....report of no distribution 8/15/2010.....discharged 10/01/2010.....closed 11/09/2010
Comment
-
This is really messed up... you need a star bk lawyer who has the time and dedication to want to make law. Because the whole idea of the means test is to move people into Chapter 13s. But if you have no cash income of your own you cannot possibly qualify for a 13. This is the law being insane, needing a judge to look at it.
(Remember this the next time you're in favor of a law which tries to take judges out of the picture--this is what happens when law gets mechanical.)
Seriously how can a couch surfer which little or no cash income not qualify for a Chapter 7 based on non-cash income that under no circumstances could ever be available to creditors?12/2009 Stopped paying CCs; 3/10 1st suit;
8/2010 finally served; No Asset 7 filed. 11 mos since last bal xfer
9/22/10 60 day club; 9/24/10 report of no distr; 11/23/10 DISCHARGED
Comment
-
Originally posted by tcreegan View Post
Found this, the way I read it is that you have to count all the roommate pays (regularly) toward household expenses as income. But not the rest of roommates income.
Also, US Trustee position is to use IRS definition of dependent but BK courts are not agreeing, using the Census definition of household instead ("heads on the beds" everyone who lives in the housing-unit)
Just in case things aren't confused enough....
Tom in ColoYou can't take a picture of this. It's already gone. ~~Nate, Six Feet Under
Comment
-
Hi Back,
What I don't understand is how would me living in a homeless shelter for 6 months prior to filing (recommended to me by a lawyer) be any different than the situation I am in now. I would have everything covered (housing/food/etc) but instead of being on someone's couch in their place, I'd be in a shelter with a ton of other people. It would be the same situation would it not? I don't see how doing that makes me eligible to file Ch. 7 but crashing on someone's couch disqualifies me. Sigh....will be calling another lawyer today I guess.
Comment
-
You have a household of 1.
You guys are making this way too complicated. Based on the info that has been given, having no income, Beheery would easily pass the means test. Beheery doesn't need the roommate added to his household size to qualify. It would be more complicated if it were the other way around. If the roommate WITH income were tryiong to file and needed the non filing roommate to get under the median.
In this case it doesn't matter. List the household size as 1. List your income (zero)on line 3. On line 8 of the means test list as income all of the expenses that your roomate contributes your household. Rent, utilities, etc. This is your income.
On the expense side list your protion of the expenses (the same number as above).
This would be no different than if this same friend rented you a seperate apartment and paid all of your expenses. He is gifting you money that you pay your utilities with.
You need to look for more attorneys or file pro se.Wife Laid off - 11/16/2009 Missed First Payments - 12/5/2009
Filed Chap 7 - 12/31/2009
341 - 2/12/2010
Discharged - 4/19/2010
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment