This is my first post on the forum, so my apologies if this isn't the correct category for this post. That being said, I did search the forum for my particular situation and didn't see anything, so I'm asking here:
I just received my Chapter 7 discharge, which is great. The problem however, is that like most others in CA who went behind on HOA, I'm now liable for my HOA dues ongoing (until the bank takes the house back or it sells as auction-- my name is off the deed). My specific question is related to the HOA Dues Collection agency and the fees they are charging.
Before my BK filing date, I have a statement with the following fees:
- Collection Cost - $250.00
- Pre-Lien Fee - $225.00
- Vesting Verification - $35.00
- Preliminary Mail Charge - $27.00
As of 8/4/2010 (after my BK filing date), they re-added all 4 of those fees to the collection notice they sent after my I received my discharge from the courts.
It seems like it should be illegal to just re-add the fees after the BK discharge back to the total collection amount (thats like getting to charge for those fees twice, if they were legally discharged by the court isn't it)?
Any and all help is greatly appreciated at this point.
Thanks!
I just received my Chapter 7 discharge, which is great. The problem however, is that like most others in CA who went behind on HOA, I'm now liable for my HOA dues ongoing (until the bank takes the house back or it sells as auction-- my name is off the deed). My specific question is related to the HOA Dues Collection agency and the fees they are charging.
Before my BK filing date, I have a statement with the following fees:
- Collection Cost - $250.00
- Pre-Lien Fee - $225.00
- Vesting Verification - $35.00
- Preliminary Mail Charge - $27.00
As of 8/4/2010 (after my BK filing date), they re-added all 4 of those fees to the collection notice they sent after my I received my discharge from the courts.
It seems like it should be illegal to just re-add the fees after the BK discharge back to the total collection amount (thats like getting to charge for those fees twice, if they were legally discharged by the court isn't it)?
Any and all help is greatly appreciated at this point.
Thanks!
Comment