In the letter we recieved the paper states:
1.) Male debtor will continue o decrease because of lack of construction start ups but BA feels that debtor has "weathered" the storm from 07-09.
2.) On line 22A the debtor deducts $600 for travel expenses and this deduction should be adjudted downward to $402. in order to comply with Internal Revnue Manual. On 22b, the debtor duducts $173 for public transportation. This amount should be redused to 0. The BA doubts that the debtors use piblic transportation as their primary source of travel.
3.) the debtors should also reduce line 31 to 0 as the debtors's already allotted a fixed amount in line 19B of $166.68 in to a health savings account whochis deducted on line 34c. Schedule J or the debtor's bank account statements support the additional medical expenses. Line 32 should be reduced to $60
4). Line 39 should be reduced to $42 as the debtor's may only deduct the actual amount they pay in addition to basic telephone and cellular services. The BA does not believe the addtional amount claimed to be reasonable and necessary, especially when it appears that the debtors are grasping at mythical deductions in previous area's of their mean's test in an attempt to "pass" the test.
With these adjustments the BA BELIEVE'S DEBTOR'S HAVE $905.10 OF DISPOABLE MONTHLY INCOME. The debtors's schedule J appears to be excessive and some expenses are not necessary.
The debtor's further deduct $120 for personal groomimg and $125 for lawn care $200 for home maitanence.-All seem excessive.
Lastly, the debtor's deduct $517 per month for student loan. A student loan is an unsecured debt.
Also we had reaffirmed 2 cars and now we have been given notice of a hearing regarding one of the cars in front of a judge- now we had to have the financial institute fix the numbers as they had originally put wrong numbers and they fixed and we resigned--so I don't know why we have to have a hearing---Any help
1.) Male debtor will continue o decrease because of lack of construction start ups but BA feels that debtor has "weathered" the storm from 07-09.
2.) On line 22A the debtor deducts $600 for travel expenses and this deduction should be adjudted downward to $402. in order to comply with Internal Revnue Manual. On 22b, the debtor duducts $173 for public transportation. This amount should be redused to 0. The BA doubts that the debtors use piblic transportation as their primary source of travel.
3.) the debtors should also reduce line 31 to 0 as the debtors's already allotted a fixed amount in line 19B of $166.68 in to a health savings account whochis deducted on line 34c. Schedule J or the debtor's bank account statements support the additional medical expenses. Line 32 should be reduced to $60
4). Line 39 should be reduced to $42 as the debtor's may only deduct the actual amount they pay in addition to basic telephone and cellular services. The BA does not believe the addtional amount claimed to be reasonable and necessary, especially when it appears that the debtors are grasping at mythical deductions in previous area's of their mean's test in an attempt to "pass" the test.
With these adjustments the BA BELIEVE'S DEBTOR'S HAVE $905.10 OF DISPOABLE MONTHLY INCOME. The debtors's schedule J appears to be excessive and some expenses are not necessary.
The debtor's further deduct $120 for personal groomimg and $125 for lawn care $200 for home maitanence.-All seem excessive.
Lastly, the debtor's deduct $517 per month for student loan. A student loan is an unsecured debt.
Also we had reaffirmed 2 cars and now we have been given notice of a hearing regarding one of the cars in front of a judge- now we had to have the financial institute fix the numbers as they had originally put wrong numbers and they fixed and we resigned--so I don't know why we have to have a hearing---Any help
Comment