Through PACER docket report, I found a new document filed yesterday.
The title of the document is
"Notice of Filing Report of No Distribution, Combined with Order Fixing Deadline to Obect Thereto"
My original deadline for objection and closing was early March, 2010.
However, the Last Day to File an Objection has been changed to Feb 2, 2010.
The document includes:
"Unless an objection is filed by the UST or a party in interest on or before the date (2/2/10), the Court will presume the estate fully administered and proceed to close the case"
.....
"If no objections are filed, no hearing will be calendared, and after the resolution of any pending matter and the entry of an order granting or denying the debtor's discharge, the Court will, without further notice, enter an order discharging the trustee and closing the case."
It sounds like a 30-day club rather than the 60-day club.
And it also souds like UST might involve in the case by 2/2/09 rather than 10-day after the 341 meeting.
Am I understanding correctly?
Is this just for distribution matters on the No Asset Case?
Many thanks in advance.
The title of the document is
"Notice of Filing Report of No Distribution, Combined with Order Fixing Deadline to Obect Thereto"
My original deadline for objection and closing was early March, 2010.
However, the Last Day to File an Objection has been changed to Feb 2, 2010.
The document includes:
"Unless an objection is filed by the UST or a party in interest on or before the date (2/2/10), the Court will presume the estate fully administered and proceed to close the case"
.....
"If no objections are filed, no hearing will be calendared, and after the resolution of any pending matter and the entry of an order granting or denying the debtor's discharge, the Court will, without further notice, enter an order discharging the trustee and closing the case."
It sounds like a 30-day club rather than the 60-day club.
And it also souds like UST might involve in the case by 2/2/09 rather than 10-day after the 341 meeting.
Am I understanding correctly?
Is this just for distribution matters on the No Asset Case?
Many thanks in advance.
Comment