Originally posted by Clouddancer
View Post
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Can chapter 7 be used as leverage to negotiate with the creditor?
Collapse
X
-
Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
-
Originally posted by squeeze View PostSo if I understand it correctly, the idea here is that you can negotiate a settlement with a creditor, and NOT file, or you can file and not negotiate.
But if you settle with one creditor, and then file against a group of other creditors, you'll have a preference issue.
Makes sense!Pay no attention to anything I post. I graduated last in my class from a fly-by-night law school that no longer exists; I never studied or went to class; and I only post on internet forums when I'm too drunk to crawl away from the computer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squeeze View PostCan you please elaborate? What kinds of tax consequences occur, and when do they occur?
If you can prove insolvency, you should be able to shed any tax liability. If you end up with 1099-Cs or are expecting to receive them, you should talk with a tax professional on the tax consequences.Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
-
wtf?
You mean that a negotiated settlement creates negative tax consequences? You use the example of a bank. In my case, it's with advertising agencies.
Let me see if I have this right. The default judgment is for hundreds of thousands. If I negotiate a 10% settlement, then the remaining 90% is taxable? And if so, at what tax rate?
Is this what you're saying, or do I have this wrong?
Comment
-
yup, that's the way it is. i think the tax rate is the regular income tax rate.
if all you can afford is 10%, then you can't afford a settlement, because income tax is, well, more than that. so even if they said they are wiling to forget the whole thing (yeah, right) you'd owe uncle sam around 30% of that. then you'd have to wait at least 3 years before filing bk in order to discharge those 30%.
sounds like bk is your only option.filed ch7 May 09
341 june 09
discharged, closed Aug 09
Comment
-
Originally posted by justbroke View PostYou can only remove a lien, through Bankrupty, if the lien impairs some underlying exemption (11 USC 522(f)). That means, that if the lien attaches to some real or personal property that you own, and the lien doesn't impair an exemption or some "part" of the exemption... the lien sticks!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Clouddancer View PostSo a lien shouldn't in most cases affect a homestead.
The key is that you would still need to "avoid" the lien by filing the appropriate motion (11 USC 522(f)) in the Bankruptcy court and then domesticate that order with the local courts, once granted. This is so that you can quash/void that lien that's impairing the homestead protection.
Also, be wary that a recorded judgment lien attaches to all personal property, so cars, boats, and other things of value may be attached. Some things, like "household goods" enjoy protection under the BK code, but a motion to avoid lien (11 USC 522(f)) still must be done.Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
-
Yeah, it's amazing how extremely powerful doing a BK really is. I wonder how this country would be without having businesses and individuals given the opp to file.
People have been threatened with all kinds of lawsuits, garnishments, judgements, etc. But filing BK can rid of all that... pretty amazing if you ask me.
The only thing better I can think of is a "President's Pardon"... but being able to file BK is a close 2nd!Retained Lawyer: 04/2009 Filed: 09/2009 341 Meeting: 10/2009 Discharged: 12/2009 Asset: 05/2010 made asset Closed: 07/2013 after 47 long months
Comment
-
Originally posted by squeeze View Postwtf?
You mean that a negotiated settlement creates negative tax consequences? You use the example of a bank. In my case, it's with advertising agencies.
Let me see if I have this right. The default judgment is for hundreds of thousands. If I negotiate a 10% settlement, then the remaining 90% is taxable? And if so, at what tax rate?
Is this what you're saying, or do I have this wrong?
Comment
-
Originally posted by billf View PostIf you are insolvent when the debt is forgiven on a 1099c you can avoid taxes on all or part of the amount forgiven - see IRS form 982
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment