In case you didn't see my thread http://www.bankruptcyforum.com/t4624...ing-today.html, there was a very friendly BK attorney sitting around my 341 hearing today who I chatted with for about half an hour.
Besides offering me free help (atypical lawyer behaviour), we chatted a bit about BK.
Interesting point#1: He felt I should be able to get my student loans discharged as well under a hardship hearing. I thought it was very difficult, but he thought I had a good chance. I am kicking myself for not asking for his card...and I only got his first name. I'll do some looking into it, but would gladly pay him to save myself all that dosh.
Intersting point #2: He says that under the new laws it's not that much different, there is just a lot more paperwork, and a good lawyer would be able to get anyone into Chapter 7...he mentioned things like the 15% you're allowed to give to charity, maximum contributions to retirement, etc. Basically you do that for a few months, and then quit as soon as you're discharged...
Interesting point #3...MBNA was one of Bush's largest contributors, and their lobbyists wrote the new BK laws. He says all it will do is increase divorce, bank robberies and suicide...and I tend to agree.
Interesting point #4...Utilities. He told me that anything I pay between the date of filing and the date of discharge is basically an overpayment...I don't owe it since it will be discharged. He said send a letter with a copy of your discharge and tell them any payments made must be credited towards future bills! I never knew that...and the bills are in my BF's name, even though I pay them Would have been nice considering that's 3 winter months of high bills...
Interesting point #5...creditors technically *can* object after the 341, but he said they almost never prevail if fought. They have to file something, and he said there is a rule for recovering costs/fees/penal damages if they don't prevail, so once you tell them you wont roll over they go away 99% of the time.
Interesting point #6...he thinks other BK lawyers suck LOL. He said he's seen cases tossed because people claimed they didn't have books or music CD's, claimed they didn't have any jewelry even though they showed up in court wearing wedding rings, etc., and even a few that checked 'none' for clothing! The interesting bit was one of the head Trustees for my 'zone' has a BK attorney wife, and she was the worst offender!
It was a very interesting talk...he was such a NICE guy it was hard to believe he was a lawyer LOL.
Besides offering me free help (atypical lawyer behaviour), we chatted a bit about BK.
Interesting point#1: He felt I should be able to get my student loans discharged as well under a hardship hearing. I thought it was very difficult, but he thought I had a good chance. I am kicking myself for not asking for his card...and I only got his first name. I'll do some looking into it, but would gladly pay him to save myself all that dosh.
Intersting point #2: He says that under the new laws it's not that much different, there is just a lot more paperwork, and a good lawyer would be able to get anyone into Chapter 7...he mentioned things like the 15% you're allowed to give to charity, maximum contributions to retirement, etc. Basically you do that for a few months, and then quit as soon as you're discharged...
Interesting point #3...MBNA was one of Bush's largest contributors, and their lobbyists wrote the new BK laws. He says all it will do is increase divorce, bank robberies and suicide...and I tend to agree.
Interesting point #4...Utilities. He told me that anything I pay between the date of filing and the date of discharge is basically an overpayment...I don't owe it since it will be discharged. He said send a letter with a copy of your discharge and tell them any payments made must be credited towards future bills! I never knew that...and the bills are in my BF's name, even though I pay them Would have been nice considering that's 3 winter months of high bills...
Interesting point #5...creditors technically *can* object after the 341, but he said they almost never prevail if fought. They have to file something, and he said there is a rule for recovering costs/fees/penal damages if they don't prevail, so once you tell them you wont roll over they go away 99% of the time.
Interesting point #6...he thinks other BK lawyers suck LOL. He said he's seen cases tossed because people claimed they didn't have books or music CD's, claimed they didn't have any jewelry even though they showed up in court wearing wedding rings, etc., and even a few that checked 'none' for clothing! The interesting bit was one of the head Trustees for my 'zone' has a BK attorney wife, and she was the worst offender!
It was a very interesting talk...he was such a NICE guy it was hard to believe he was a lawyer LOL.
Comment