When do I physically need to be around curing the process?

[swampwiz]

I'm curious about this. I want to be in a position to be able to relocate temporarily to find work. My attorney said that after I officially file, there will be a meeting I will need to attend with the trustee (is that the 342 meeting?), but after that I will not need to be around. I am wondering when the trustee would want to inspect my personal belongings. Would that be before this meeting, or thereafter? If the latter is accurate, should I ask the trustee if and when he will be wanting to do this, or should I just lay low?

I hope my fans are not missing my torrent of thread postings. When my attorney told me that my case is easy, and that he has not had an objection in 18 years of doing this, I felt MUCH better.

[swampwiz]

OOPS! That should be "during".

[Penny Less]

Your postings are getting more readable.

I find myself in your shoes. Can't stay - no jobs here - but can't go - need this thing to finish.

If you have enough money to feed yourself just hang out for a few months.

Play the bkforum arcade. Re-think your life.

[frogger]

I hope my fans are not missing my torrent of thread postings.

It was very nice while you were gone.....

[OhioFiler]

Whoever told you you must attend your 342 hearing was misleading you.

[music12]

ohiofiler, seems like you don't like swampwiz very much, or else you would not mislead him into not attending his trustee meeting, even if he misstated a number - 342 instead of the correct 341. but, in the process you could be misleading others who do can't read your sarcasm between the lines.

so, swampwiz and everybody out there: you MUST attend the 341 meeting. other than that, in 99% of the time you don't need to attend anything else, and in 99.999% of the time, the trustee will not be coming over to inspect your belongings. they have no time for that.

[backtoschool]

ohiofiler, seems like you don't like swampwiz very much, or else you would not mislead him into not attending his trustee meeting, even if he misstated a number - 342 instead of the correct 341. but, in the process you could be misleading others who do can't read your sarcasm between the lines.

so, swampwiz and everybody out there: you MUST attend the 341 meeting. other than that, in 99% of the time you don't need to attend anything else, and in 99.999% of the time, the trustee will not be coming over to inspect your belongings. they have no time for that.

Swampwiz's case is quite complicated, so there might be other mandatory events involved like a 2004 exam due to the land grant situation. There could also be AP's due to the cash advances taken to day trade in the stock market.

[OhioFiler]

Paragraph 342 deals with notification procedures and I assumed swampwiz intended to participate in the process by meeting with the trustee or his staff to ensure all parties are in fact notified in accordance with the law.

[AngelinaCatHub]

Frogger, an honest opinion, Ohio, some just have no sense of humor, Music, you are technically correct, but we have all seen certain "attention getting" attempts by our host Swampwiz. Swampwiz has 110 posts since Sept, and most of it was misleading if not factual at all. He/she needs to read more and post less. The stickies that are in front of every Forum actually is a very good source for basic educational information. Then when a real question comes up, we are most earnestly eager to help. But, when they won't help themselves or are here for other reasons than real information, some wonder....... 'Hub

[swampwiz]

Swampwiz's case is quite complicated, so there might be other mandatory events involved like a 2004 exam due to the land grant situation. There could also be AP's due to the cash advances taken to day trade in the stock market.

Evidently my attorney does not think the same way as backtoschool. By the time I file, I will have already purchased a home which would satisfy the terms of the grant agreement. There is no problem with taking cash advances and investing in the stock market at the same time (perhaps there was a problem with me investing the grant in the stock market, but that is not an issue with BK.) I could have xxxxxx away those cash advances at casinos and brothels in Nevada if I had so chosen. As it turned out, I had actually *earned* a profit from those investments, and in any case, slowly liquidated those investments to live on, paying for my insurance, rent, groceries, etc., and most importantly, my debt payments! I had taken a bath on some prior investments that was so far back that it could not be traced to any cash advances even back then.

[shabam]

There is no problem with taking cash advances and investing in the stock market at the same time (perhaps there was a problem with me investing the grant in the stock market, but that is not an issue with BK.) I could have xxxxxx away those cash advances at casinos and brothels in Nevada if I had so chosen.

The problem will not be with the trustee but can be with the creditor filing an AP against you. 70/90 day rule does not limit them to that time period.

[AngelinaCatHub]

The problem will not be with the trustee but can be with the creditor filing an AP against you. 70/90 day rule does not limit them to that time period.

'Bam, I hate to say this, but, I just do not understand the multitude of scenarios this OP has submitted. I give him the benefit of doubt, but he really need to address a lawyer, and not ask us advice. He states he has one, I would rather hear what his lawyer says about his actions.

I hear: Real Estate, houses owned, houses to be built, This then that, now some Trust or grant. A Grant usually has conditions. Nevada cat houses are not one. (boy, could I use one. LOL)

This guy does not sound legit. I'm sorry, I have given my all in patience. 'Hub

[AngelinaCat]

Swampwiz, you are a wizard...... in your mind only.

Since you 'appear' to have an attorney that will shepherd you through all of your grandiose schemes in dealing with BK, please confine your communications to him/her.

Please do NOT continue to post your schemes/questions here, as the new posters coming aboad are looking for legitimate, honest solutions to their very real problems, not your schemes.

I am closing this thread. If you start another one up with the same tone, questions, and schemes, you will be banned. This is your second warning, and the last one.

AC