Hello again... I recently had a consultation with the Attorney firm that represented me during my civil judgment matter. They are not BK specialists, but I took the liberty of picking their brains while I was picking up my court documents. Unfortunately, they were not able to give me a lot of great info, but they did bring up some concerns that I should look into.
One of which is how the Trustee will view me filing for BK mainly to discharge a $27k civil judgment and some very old CC collections totaling about $4k. The Attorney brought up that the owner of the judgment can argue that I'm only filing for BK to discharge his judgment and not due to hardship. Which I can see his argument since I'm not under a mound of debt and the only other debts I have are those small collections from over 2-3 years ago and they've quit harassing me.
So is this something I should be concerned about? Do I "NOT" have enough debt to warrant a BK7? How strange I'm asking this question
One of which is how the Trustee will view me filing for BK mainly to discharge a $27k civil judgment and some very old CC collections totaling about $4k. The Attorney brought up that the owner of the judgment can argue that I'm only filing for BK to discharge his judgment and not due to hardship. Which I can see his argument since I'm not under a mound of debt and the only other debts I have are those small collections from over 2-3 years ago and they've quit harassing me.
So is this something I should be concerned about? Do I "NOT" have enough debt to warrant a BK7? How strange I'm asking this question
Comment