Received a summons today for AC breach of contract...

[InDebtNeedHelp]

I will revise. Thank you for the input. I couldn't have done it without this website. I was clueless, but now I am getting some semblance of a clue. Knowledge is power.

other than my comments above, i think it sounds really good! see, you went from saying you were completely clueless to writing a great answer! hooray!

[InDebtNeedHelp]

1. Where I live.
2. I borrowed monies from the Defendant.

by the way, what is it that you are admitting to in par 1 and 2?

[2manybills]

Also, included in your last paragraph should be something to the effect:

WHEREFORE, defendant prays that plaintiff take nothing by way of this suit, for costs of suit incurred herein and -------- ** the rest of what you have. Your final paragraph should always include that you are requesting that they are awarded nothing.

[InDebtNeedHelp]

Thanks. Revised.

Also, included in your last paragraph should be something to the effect:

WHEREFORE, defendant prays that plaintiff take nothing by way of this suit, for costs of suit incurred herein and -------- ** the rest of what you have. Your final paragraph should always include that you are requesting that they are awarded nothing.

[InDebtNeedHelp]

[music12]

as to par 2, i think you should say you lack knowledge etc. for that too. otherwise, it's inconsistent with your answer to par 3,4,5,6, and if i were that creditor the first thing i would say is: he admits he borrowed from us! and hey, that's the most important thing.

then they'll put the burden of proof on you to show that what you admit you borrowed in par. 2 was different from what they say you borrowed in par 3-6. they could even say they have no record of anything else having been borrowed by you from them, thereby proving you owe what they say you owe.

so i wouldn't admit to par 2 either.

[InDebtNeedHelp]

Thanks! Will revise.

as to par 2, i think you should say you lack knowledge etc. for that too. otherwise, it's inconsistent with your answer to par 3,4,5,6, and if i were that creditor the first thing i would say is: he admits he borrowed from us! and hey, that's the most important thing.

then they'll put the burden of proof on you to show that what you admit you borrowed in par. 2 was different from what they say you borrowed in par 3-6. they could even say they have no record of anything else having been borrowed by you from them, thereby proving you owe what they say you owe.

so i wouldn't admit to par 2 either.