top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone here good at Pacer searching and want to help me?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by TeacherMomma View Post
    Yes! I have that still thanks!
    Can I have it or is it a Lexis/Westlaw link?
    Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
    Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
    Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

    Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

    Comment


      #32
      It is the Delbecq case/Indiana, and I just sent it to you.
      Teacher Momma

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by TeacherMomma View Post
        It is the Delbecq case/Indiana, and I just sent it to you.
        Was that the one I sent you before??? (puzzled)! (Thanks!)
        Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
        Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
        Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

        Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by TeacherMomma View Post
          Nope. I am in a 7 facing dismissal on 707B. .
          707(b)(2) or 707(b)(3) or both?
          Pay no attention to anything I post. I graduated last in my class from a fly-by-night law school that no longer exists; I never studied or went to class; and I only post on internet forums when I'm too drunk to crawl away from the computer.

          Comment


            #35
            JB: I sent her the full case info, including the UST motion to dismiss, the objection to motion to dismiss, etc. from Westlaw. If you need them sent, I still have on my computer at home.
            Filed Chapter 7: 7/3/09
            341 Hearing: 8/6/09 - Went Smoothly!
            Discharged: 11/30/2009
            Closed: 12/16/2009

            Comment


              #36
              We have discussed it JustBroke.

              And MsBK, it is a 707b1, b2 and then they list in "the alternate" b3. I'd be happy to email you his motion if you want to offer any suggestions.
              Teacher Momma

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by MSbklawyer View Post
                707(b)(2) or 707(b)(3) or both?
                707(b)(1), 707(b)(2) and 707(b)(3)(B) "totality of circumstances". There is no bad faith objection under 707(b)(3)(A). Only the presumption and the "totality of circumstances".
                Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
                Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
                Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

                Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by 2manybills View Post
                  JB: I sent her the full case info, including the UST motion to dismiss, the objection to motion to dismiss, etc. from Westlaw. If you need them sent, I still have on my computer at home.
                  Thank 2many. I have them. I was just wondering if it was the same case. I now have the Motion and the Order Denying. Thanks!
                  Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
                  Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
                  Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

                  Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by justbroke View Post
                    707(b)(1), 707(b)(2) and 707(b)(3)(B) "totality of circumstances". There is no bad faith objection under 707(b)(3)(A). Only the presumption and the "totality of circumstances".
                    Thanks for clarifying!
                    Teacher Momma

                    Comment


                      #40
                      No problem.
                      Filed Chapter 7: 7/3/09
                      341 Hearing: 8/6/09 - Went Smoothly!
                      Discharged: 11/30/2009
                      Closed: 12/16/2009

                      Comment


                        #41
                        wow, what a thread! fascinating subject and postings.

                        i think if the trustee is relying on local practice, then certainly rebutting that with a list of case numbers where the opposite happened is relevant. would be even better if you find a list of case numbers with the same trustee where he allowed the opposite to happen right under his nose. however, be prepared for the trustee to come up with some other reason why in those cases this issue was not material. so if you have a really long list, you would be much better off.

                        then everything else you rely on would have to be court opinions, preferably district court or circuit opinions because those are binding on the bk court (bk court opinions are not necessarily binding on bk court, but can be used to persuade a judge one way or another).

                        to save on pacer, if you have the time i'd go physically to the clerk's office and sit there at the terminals looking for schedule J's, then keep a list of those supporting your position and save only those to your own computer when you get back home. looking up stuff in the terminal in the courthouse is free as long as you don't print anything.
                        filed ch7 May 09
                        341 june 09
                        discharged, closed Aug 09

                        Comment


                          #42
                          I think the Trustee HAS to object to keep his job...otherwise everyone who files will put SL's as expenses even the ones that are subject to ICR, deferment, or other payment options....Sometimes they do what they HAVE to do and leave it up to the Judge.

                          Interesting thread for sure.
                          7-2-2009 Filed
                          8-28-09 341 Concluded, no assets
                          10-28-09 DISCHARGED/CLOSED!!!!

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by whipster1 View Post
                            I think the Trustee HAS to object to keep his job...otherwise everyone who files will put SL's as expenses even the ones that are subject to ICR, deferment, or other payment options....Sometimes they do what they HAVE to do and leave it up to the Judge.
                            This was a point that I was making in another thread. Many Trustees, as an example, will file a Motion to Determine Dischargeability if they see any significant charges in the 90 days preceding the bankruptcy. They figure that they may catch a bunch of people... and it saves them from researching before even going for the motion. They do it just on principle.
                            Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
                            Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
                            Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

                            Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Yes, I know this to be the case as he has told me so directly, about how bad he feels, etc. I talked to him Friday and I have to call him tomorrow - he is doing a stipulation to give me more time to respond/convert, since my response is due 8/12. He said I can come down Tues and sign it, since the office is near me and I am off work till Thurs. So, I can't say anything bad about the guy.....I have a job too.
                              Teacher Momma

                              Comment

                              bottom Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X