Anyone know whether you need to proactively seek a 722 redemption (redeeming your car at current market value) in your BK filing, or ask your lender for one? Or will they approach you with the offer?
And is a 722 better than none? We're upside down on our car and we listed it as "neither redeem nor surrender" - which is allowed in Oregon, as long as you're current on payments as we are. I've heard nothing from the lender, one month after filing. If they don't request redemption, then after discharge I can keep the car til it needs replacing, then simply walk away from it without liability (they can't come after me for whatever's left on the loan, because my liability will have been discharged in the bk). That, to me, is better than a new loan, even at market value.
Any thoughts?
And is a 722 better than none? We're upside down on our car and we listed it as "neither redeem nor surrender" - which is allowed in Oregon, as long as you're current on payments as we are. I've heard nothing from the lender, one month after filing. If they don't request redemption, then after discharge I can keep the car til it needs replacing, then simply walk away from it without liability (they can't come after me for whatever's left on the loan, because my liability will have been discharged in the bk). That, to me, is better than a new loan, even at market value.
Any thoughts?
Comment