top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I got a notice from the BK court today it doesn't add up..r/o

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    I got a notice from the BK court today it doesn't add up..r/o

    The UST withdrew his motion to dismiss on July 1. It's entered with the BK court and it's on Pacer already.

    Now today I got another mailing from the BK court. It says scheduling order pertaining to motion to dismiss for abuse. It goes on to say that: On this date the Court reviewed the file in the above-referenced case. In order to facilitate the just, speedy and inexpensive disposition of this contested matter without the necessity of conducting a management conference, just cause exists for the issuance of this Scheduling Order for this CONTESTED matter.

    What? This isn't contested anymore. It's dated 7/1 which is the same date that the UST withdrew his motion. My discharge should be around the 21 st of this month.

    I'm assuming that this is a standard hearing that the BK court has set for us and that they don't realize this has already been settled. I mean it's already been settled right? Since the UST withdrew I thought that settled it.

    If it is just a mistake on the BK court's end will my discharge still come on time or do I need to call my lawyer or the BK clerk about it on Monday?
    4/09 Converted to a Ch 7 due to loss in dh's income
    5/09 UST now involved no idea what happens next
    7/09 UST has decided to withdraw his motion to dismiss!
    7/27/09 DISCHARGED!!!

    #2
    Most likely it was mailed before the motion was dropped.

    However on Monday I could call the lawyer and mention the letter. See what he has to say about it. Then you could call the clerk and mention you noticed on PACER that the motion had been dropped but you got the letter and are wondering what is up.
    May 31st, 2007: Petition Filed by my lawyer
    July 2nd, 2007: 341 Meeting Held
    September 4th, 2007: Discharged and Closed.

    Comment


      #3
      once the clerk realizes the motion was dropped, they should cancel the scheduling order - there is nothing to schedule!
      filed ch7 May 09
      341 june 09
      discharged, closed Aug 09

      Comment


        #4
        I looked again and where the motion was initially entered it says this instead
        *** Motion withdrawn by UST on 7/1/09***

        It's in huge big, bold red caps like it's a reminder for the clerk. I guess it got overlooked anyway though. It's actually kind of funny. When you scan through the titles of all our documents that one really stands out.

        I'll give them a call Monday morning. I can't wait for my discharge and I'm hoping it will come before August.
        4/09 Converted to a Ch 7 due to loss in dh's income
        5/09 UST now involved no idea what happens next
        7/09 UST has decided to withdraw his motion to dismiss!
        7/27/09 DISCHARGED!!!

        Comment


          #5
          Yes it just crossed in timing. Your discharge should not be affected in any way. It is like on a time clock unless you are found to become an asset case. Then 30 more days are added on. You will be O.K. 'Hub
          If I knew it all, would I be here?? Hang in there = Retained attorney 8-06, Filed 12-28-07, Discharge 8-13-08, Finally CLOSED 11-3-09, 3-31-10 AP Dismissed, Informed by incompetent lawyer of CLOSED status, October 14, 2010.

          Comment


            #6
            'Hub, how long is it after the 341 that they have to tell you if you are an asset case? can they do that on day 60?
            filed ch7 May 09
            341 june 09
            discharged, closed Aug 09

            Comment

            bottom Ad Widget

            Collapse
            Working...
            X