-
-
??
Why would you have to use the same exemptions as your wife, since what she used previously was for a BK that is not related to you? I guess you were already(your" new wife " term confused me a little) married to her when she filed her BK?I know you have the same attorney but why would your separate BK have to be under the same exemption? What was the reason yr attorney gave you for the trustee doing that? Is that because CA is a community property state?Your BK is a Ch 7 or 13? Your wife's?Last edited by Proxy; 07-02-2009, 02:30 PM. -
Yes, we were married in June 2008 and she filed in October on debts unrelated to me. She actually used a different attorney, I did not go to them because they seemed incompetent. As it turns out they were.
My attorney says the Trustee is doing this so he can disallow the 11k I claimed on my wildcard exemption to go towards my unsecured creditors (so he can get a commission of course).
We both filed a ch. 7.
I guess its the law that they have to be under the same exemption...I dont really know. Thats part of the reason I am asking here.Comment
-
Bump...anyone?Comment
-
Whats your case number, and what is the trustee's name?Originally posted by cptne33 View PostComment
-
Sorry for the delayed response....the trustees name is Christopher Barclay.Originally posted by California View Post
WHy would you need the case #?Comment
- You are you viewing the Bankruptcy Forum as a guest (limited viewing).
Don't have a BKForum account yet?
Please REGISTER (it's FREE & takes 30 seconds) so you can post your own questions and see all the features available to registered users. - Welcome to the Bankruptcy Forum aka BKForum. We have strict rules and guidelines to which everyone must adhere to.
Please review our rules before you make your first post.
Comment