my take on appliances is about the condition you found the house in. If there was Stove A in the house when you bought it, then you got rid of Stove A and put in your own Stove B, then there is no argument about the existence of a stove in your house when you bought it.
Unless there was NO STOVE in the house when you bought it, I would think you at least owe the lender A STOVE. Maybe not your dope one that you like, but at least one that heats food.....
Also, lets say you were selling the house. Would you have the same stipulation for the next buyer. "Deal, I'll sell you this house...but I'm taking my stove". If you would have included the stove in the sale of the house, then I think 2-way-street-ology would say that the stove is part of the house when it's convenient and when its inconvenient.
Unless there was NO STOVE in the house when you bought it, I would think you at least owe the lender A STOVE. Maybe not your dope one that you like, but at least one that heats food.....
Also, lets say you were selling the house. Would you have the same stipulation for the next buyer. "Deal, I'll sell you this house...but I'm taking my stove". If you would have included the stove in the sale of the house, then I think 2-way-street-ology would say that the stove is part of the house when it's convenient and when its inconvenient.
Comment