top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ch 7 Presumption finding....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ch 7 Presumption finding....

    Hi all,

    I just registered to get some feedback on our Ch 7 proceedings.

    My wife and I filed for Ch 13 on 30 May 2008. We had income as follows: $78K per year from my job, with additional variable pay annual lump sum bonus of between $15-30K. My wife owns her own home cleaning business and our income from that was about $20K per year, much less after deductions but they don't allow that in the filing process.

    We had proposed a payment of $350/month for 5 years to the trustee for the creditors on debt of $130K unsecured and $243K secured. We waited until fall of last year to hear the trustee had rejected that proposal.

    In the meantime on June 24th, 2008 I admitted myself to an alcoholism rehab treatment program. I was in there for 7 days and decided to go from there right into another 30 day residential treatment program. This was my 3rd time into a treatment program and I had to make sobriety work.

    In the treatment programs I was away on FMLA with short term disability running concurrent with FMLA. My wife and I decided to I should stay in the residential treatment program for a full 90 days and I did so. Short term disability runs 6 months with the first 90 days at full salary and the second 90 at 75% of salary. I also had to give up my car allowance when on short term disability.

    Because I stayed the full 90 days in the residential treatment program my company was able to reassign my job (policy states after 90 days they may do so and it was sales). Upon my return to work I would be an employee in an unassigned status, with no pay, and have 90 days to find a position internally or be released (fired).

    Due to the economic climate and my company also doing downsizing I decided to stay on disability and fully focus on my recovery. In mid-December 2008 I was approved for long term disability based on my medical caregivers recommendations that I not return to work until I was considered to be in full sustained remission with my alcoholism. My long term policy provides for benefits of 60% of salary (before tax) payments monthly, with no taxes to be paid as the premium was paid with after tax dollars.

    I believe I likely have until the end of June 2009 for the long term disability approval to run through (as that will be my 12 months of sustained sobriety). The insurance company has conditionally approved my disability for the 24 months the policy allows for, of course that has to be documented and approved every 4-6 weeks by my healthcare providers...and benefits could be terminated at anytime by the insurance case file manager.

    A key question is this: I do not have a job to return to. Once my disability has ended the inactive employee status also ends with the company and I will have no job. How does the court likely view this even though I am on disability?

    Given these changes of events in December 2008 my wife and I spoke with our attorney about converting to a Ch 7 from the Ch 13. He did the means test, we passed, and we were just under the state threshold for a family of 4 income-wise.

    So in mid January 2009 we converted to Ch 7. We had only just finally heard from our Ch 13 trustee with her denial of our proposed payment amounts in late November 2008!

    We had our meeting with the panel trustee in the 341 hearing and she asked for a couple additional documents providing explanations for some money we had spent after our Ch 13 filing. I told her my story about the alcoholism rehab and disability status and she seemed encouraging about it. We provided the evidence she asked for and she was satisfied and later issued her no asset finding.... asking the court to be withdrawn from the case.

    But 9 days after the 341 we heard from the US Trustee by mail with a 707 Presumption of Abuse notice. He would either seek dismissal, move us to a 13or request withdrawal of his Presumption in 30 days.

    Neither we, nor our lawyer have yet to be asked for any supporting documentation or been contacted in any way by the US Trustee aside from the letter of notification. Because we have converted from 13 to 7 we cannot be recommended to move to a 13 at worst and would need to refile if our case is dismissed completely.... with all attendent costs.

    I asked our attorney if there was a problem and how to proceed and he said no we would be fine and to be patient. I asked if he intended to contact the US Trustee and he said no they would wait to learn of the finding by the US Trustee first. If necessary he said there would be a hearing scheduled and he believed we would come out fine if that process were necessary. He completely reassured us that he thought things would work in our favor.

    We have until the 15th of April 2009 to hear from the US Trustee regarding his decision for our case in terms of the Presumption of Abuse. Does anyone have any thoughts or insights?

    Thanks,
    Soonerfan

    #2
    First, I congratulate you for your worthy efforts at healing yourself, your soul, your family. This was a brave thing knowing what you knew.

    I, like your lawyer, would say, hang in there. The UST is only doing his job. He has numbers to fulfill also on his behalf.

    Understand, I am not a lawyer, only a fellow bk person. I believe your story, told as you have here, could not be dismissed as anything but worthy.

    My recommendation, (other than listen to your lawyer first) is, have all med records on hand for the Judge as you have had a 341 and if anyone wishes to dismiss, you will at least have a hearing.

    Hang in there and please do not back-slide, as you know, and I can guess, that much was because of your affliction. Cast it out. GBWY ‘Hub
    If I knew it all, would I be here?? Hang in there = Retained attorney 8-06, Filed 12-28-07, Discharge 8-13-08, Finally CLOSED 11-3-09, 3-31-10 AP Dismissed, Informed by incompetent lawyer of CLOSED status, October 14, 2010.

    Comment


      #3
      Since you have no job to return to, Schedules I and J won't be a problem. The UST must be asserting POA based on your means test. The UST must be defining income in your case as "money received from all sources during the six months prior to filing". If you can balance this income out with expenses (including rehabilitation) over those six months, you should be able to get through this. If I were you, I would go through the means test line by line, include as income everything you've received and subtract all of your expenses out. If that puts you above the POA threshold, I'd have my attorney present those calculations to the UST for consideration. You'd have to submit documentation to back up your numbers, though - can't do it without receipts. You'd have to get these to the UST very quickly, Monday if possible.

      If the UST files a motion to dismiss/convert next Wednesday, you could try to argue your special circumstances afterward. This could get expensive, so I think your best option is to communicate with the UST now. If you have any significant exempt assets you can part with, offering them up for liquidation to repay creditors might help.

      Comment


        #4
        I don't have anything to add but...


        YOU ROCK! for facing your issues head on and putting yourself in a long term rehab program to ensure your best chance at sobriety.

        Kudos to you my friend for doing the best thing possible for yourself, your family and your future.

        I know that time away from your family must have been very difficult and the road to sobriety must have been tough but CONGRATULATIONS on your success and keep your eye on the "prize"- a healthy, loving future with your family!


        Hope all goes well with your BK case and we are all here to support you.

        Good luck!

        DD

        Comment


          #5
          Absolutely! Keep looking forward to a better tomorrow thanks to your commitment to put yourself and your family first. Life is never easy but you have chosen to meet it head on and that took tremendous courage. I wish you nothing but success and I bet you hear soon that the US Trustee found nothing in your case and you are discharged. Congratulations!
          Ch 7 filed: 3/30
          341: 5/12
          Discharged and Closed 7/20: Now known as- Free Willy

          Comment


            #6
            Just received....

            We just received the latest posting by the US Trustee pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 704(b)(2) which relates to the Presumption of Abuse filing. It looks like the US Trustee will not file a motion to dismiss. It indicates that "Debtors have demonstrated circumstances that justify adjustment to the Debtor's monthly income/expenses, and that, after such adjustment(s), the presumption of abuse would not arise." Apparently a motion to dismiss "is not appropriate".

            I guess the attorney knew the Trustee and the court's attitude related to matters like these. I think we now look for discharge. It does reduce stress quite a bit to hear that news.

            I will be filing our 2008 income tax return on Monday April 13th and the Panel Trustee neither inquired about it, and filed us as no asset no distribution, nor said we had to turn it over. What do you think that will happen to it? It will likely be about $9K due to all of the medical expenses we can deduct for last year. Since we originally filed on May 30th with the Ch 13 and then converted it to a Ch 7 would'nt at least 7/12 of it be ours? Any thoughts in regards to that matter?

            Comment


              #7
              my lawyer told me that the trustee would have access to 7/12 of our 2009 refund (we plan to file in July09)....unless we provided some sort of exemption for it...like the Nevada wildcard exempton or something, but I just plan to adjust tax withholdings now so that I can eliminate as much of my refund as possible.
              waiting to file in july-august,
              waiting for Chase to begin foreclosure,
              waiting for cc's to begin lawsuits,
              just waiting (& "afraid")...

              Comment


                #8
                I just sent away my 1040 and our tax preparer said we needed to pay $1,500 for taxes due from my wife's business for 2009. He said we needed to do this because to date I have had no taxable income of my own. Normally my excess withholding covers her taxes owed annually...but this year we don't have that luxury. So we had IRS withhold $1,500 from the $8,900 return we had coming. Is this going to be a problem if the US Trustee has flagged our 2008 tax return? Would IRS simply withhold it and only turn over the remainder of the return's $7,400. I guess I'll have to wait and see as so far I don't know if the US Trustee will take our return and I don't think I want to ask her. The panel trustee did not mention the return but I do know the US Trustee is the one who has to send the letter to the IRS to flag the return....

                Our refund is so big this year in large part to the medical expenses incurred after the filing of our BK in May 08. If the US Trustee does take the refund I may approach him about taking less than 5/12's because the size of the refund was due to money spent on deductions incurred after the filing...... Hopefully we just get the whole refund with no problems.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Did you get your report of no distribution ( no asset) yet post 341?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Yes (no asset was the panel trustee's decision) and so now I guess we await discharge unless there is some other hangup that we are unaware of. I believe the court system is satisfied with our case and now I wait for how the tax refund plays out.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Were you able to exempt the tax return?

                      The tax return issue is something I don't get in BK. My understanding is, in a Ch 7 , if you are ruled no asset, and the Trustee reports a no asset/no distribution finding, why can the Trustee take a tax return?

                      If there is no distribution in the case, then how can they take a tax return, when there is nothing to distribute?

                      My logic tells me, if you are ruled no asset, then the Trustee has no authority to take a tax return. Do they then change you to an asset case and then distribute the tax return to your creditors unless that asset is exmpted in your schedules?


                      That is a weird area of BK law I don't understand.

                      Doesn't the debtor rely on the no asset/no distribution finding to know whether he can spend/use whatever money/assets he has exmpted?

                      Maybe HHM can clarify?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        No exemption on the return as in Indiana there is a puny $300 per filer exemption for "intangibles"....which is how they handle cash assets. The IRS indicates that unless there is tax associated debts with the IRS in the filing of a Ch 7....

                        5.9.6.1.1 (04-01-2006)
                        Notice and Filings
                        Notice to IRS. Notice of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing must be given to the Service when the IRS is listed as a creditor in the debtor's schedules (Bankruptcy Rule 2002(f)).

                        5.9.6.1.3 (05-20-2008)
                        Chapter 7 Tax Refunds to Trustees
                        Property of the Estate. A Chapter 7 debtor's right to a refund (where the refund statute has not expired) is considered property of the bankruptcy estate to the extent the refund is attributable to prepetition events. As such they are subject to turnover to the Chapter 7 trustee even though the debtor may be in full tax compliance.



                        .... that the US Trustee must issue a letter requesting action on the IRS's part.....

                        Turnover Procedures. The IRS and the Executive Office of the US Trustees (EOUST) have agreed to the following conditions for the Service's turning over taxpayers' income tax refunds which are considered wholly or partially property of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate.

                        The trustee must request the turnover of refunds in writing for specific taxpayers. The trustee may use a form prepared by the IRS or may request the turnover on official letterhead.

                        The US Trustee's office will encourage trustees not to submit long rosters of their debtor inventories and to refrain from requesting small dollar refunds; however, the Service will not refuse to accept rosters or small dollar requests.

                        Insolvency will honor trustees' requests for turnover for 180 days from receiving the turnover request or for 180 days after the due date of a return (including extensions), whichever is later. If no return is received within these 180 day periods, the turnover request will not be honored.

                        Example:
                        If a trustee submits a turnover request on February 12, 2006, for a 2005 tax year refund, Insolvency will turnover any refund available up to and through April 13, 2007, assuming the debtor has an approved extension to file his 2005 return no later than October 15, 2006.


                        Example:
                        If a trustee submits a turnover request on February 12, 2006, for a 2004 tax year refund, Insolvency will turnover any refund available up to and through August 11, 2006 (180 days after the request is made).


                        Insolvency will not compute prepetition and postpetition refund allocations, nor amounts due the debtor as opposed to a non-debtor spouse in the case of a jointly filed return. Those calculations will be completed by the trustee. The trustee is responsible for refunding monies for postpetition allocations and to non-debtor spouses if applicable.

                        As soon as the turnover notice is received, Insolvency will input the appropriate bankruptcy freeze code and closing code on related accounts to hold the refund. If no account is found on IDRS, the Insolvency caseworker will create a dummy module with the appropriate freeze (TC 520 cc81) to hold credits.

                        Note:
                        When no accounts are on IDRS and the bankruptcy is a joint filing, dummy accounts must be established for both husband and wife in the event the spouses file separately for the refund period.

                        IRM 5.9.15.5 provides instructions for establishing dummy modules.

                        Trustee requests for refund turnover received after the refund has been remitted to the debtor or before a pending refund can be intercepted will not be honored.


                        Note:
                        The turnover agreement procedures do not limit either the Service's right of setoff or domestic support agencies' rights of setoff.


                        Turnover Processing Steps. Exhibit 5.9.6-2 provides specific guidance for processing Chapter 7 trustee turnovers.

                        Refund Turnover Requests for Discharged Cases. If a taxpayer files a return for a prepetition period after a discharge has been granted and a refund credit is generated, the automatic stay is no longer in effect. That credit may be offset against any existing federal tax debt owed by the taxpayer. If a trustee has requested a turnover of that refund credit, Insolvency should first offset the credit against the current tax liabilities, and any remaining credit should be manually refunded to the trustee.


                        Does that help? I do not know if a stay ordered by the court is still in effect if that prevents the refund from being confiscated..... Anyone know?

                        Info obtained at the following link: http://www.irs.gov/irm/part5/ch09s06.html

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I think, but I could be wrong, that the trustee has to request the refund through either an IRS procedure or directly trough the debtor.

                          If the UST and the panel TT haven't mentioned it, you are probably in good shape to keep it.

                          Hopefully! Keepin' my fingers crossed for you.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            You are right about the trustee notifying IRS, but they don't have to ask you or even let you know. It does not seem that the letter to the IRS by the trustee gets filed in Pacer either..... so it can seem like limbo to those who don't want to ask the trustee directly.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              This is a great example why we should all periodically look at our withholdings throughout the tax year. If one realizes a new deduction like your medical bills it makes sense to recalculate one's estimated liability for the year. An $8,900 overpayment is a lot! You have over $750 each month, on average, you loaned the IRS.

                              I am surprised your accountant is suggesting a quarterly tax payment of $1,500. He's projecting your tax debt at $6,000 for the year. Seems high to me given your current situation.
                              Well, I did. Every one of 'em. Mostly I remember the last one. The wild finish. A guy standing on a station platform in the rain with a comical look in his face because his insides have been kicked out. -Rick

                              Comment

                              bottom Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X