top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Preferential Payment-Please HELP!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Did you pay the credit card or your Mom? This will make a difference in how the trustee goes after the money. If you paid the CC directly, then the trustee will just go after the CC company for the $6000. Of course then the CC company will come after your Mom for the money. Either way you're going to have to tell her so she knows what is coming her way. I agree that it was poor advice on your lawyers part not to have you wait a few more months for the 1 year look-back.
    Filed CH 13 September 17, 2007
    Plan Modified July 8, 2009 from $1100/month to $400/month due to change in income, finally discharged in July of 2013!

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by woeisme View Post
      Did you pay the credit card or your Mom?
      Good catch. I missed that fine detail!
      Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
      Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
      Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

      Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

      Comment


        #18
        If they go after the credit card companies, would that then be a 90 day preference period?
        Last edited by Willy13; 04-06-2009, 07:28 AM.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by NeedNewStart View Post
          Can you make some kind of payment plan with the trustee to pay it yourself?
          I am pretty sure that is what Angelina Cat and Hub did - a payment plan. You might PM them and ask.
          Filed Ch 7 -- July 9, 2008
          341 mtg ---- August 14, 2008
          Discharged ---- October 17, 2008
          Closed --------- December 11, 2009!

          Comment


            #20
            Ok thanks everyone! The payment was made to her card(Chase) for the full amount. What sucks is that we cashed out our retirement plan because we hated owing anyone money and then now we are paying it again. Oh well....I guess that proves that we were not planning our bk filing by any means.

            I am not bringing up that they should be after chase because I feel like Chase might pay them the 6k and go after my mom and then of course we pay it all.

            What a nightmare!

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by StartingOver08 View Post
              The lookback period for insider payments is one year. OP, I wonder why your attorney did not counsel you to wait a year to file?
              I wonder that too. I asked him once but he told me that probably better to chance it since I quit paying my cards in November. And before I get a repo and bankruptcy on report.

              Comment


                #22
                Sorry for the multiple posts....

                Does anyone know if the trustee did decide to go after Chase, how hard would it be to get that money from Chase or do they have to hand it over?

                Comment


                  #23
                  They'll go after Chase not your mother if the payment was made directly to them. It's not an insider payment. It's a preferential payment.
                  Well, I did. Every one of 'em. Mostly I remember the last one. The wild finish. A guy standing on a station platform in the rain with a comical look in his face because his insides have been kicked out. -Rick

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by OhioFiler View Post
                    They'll go after Chase not your mother if the payment was made directly to them. It's not an insider payment. It's a preferential payment.
                    How is it preferential if that long ago?

                    Its either "insider" (1 year)

                    or "preferential" (90 days)

                    or is there something in between?

                    This really is an interesting question.

                    HHM?
                    Filed Ch 7 -- July 9, 2008
                    341 mtg ---- August 14, 2008
                    Discharged ---- October 17, 2008
                    Closed --------- December 11, 2009!

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by PoorGrammyinBK7 View Post
                      How is it preferential if that long ago?

                      Its either "insider" (1 year)

                      or "preferential" (90 days)

                      or is there something in between?

                      This really is an interesting question.

                      HHM?

                      Good question.

                      Perhaps the courts don't recognize the debt to Chase as the petitioner's debt and the payment was made simply on the relative's (insider) behalf. That the court looks at the payment as a transfer to the insider by way of the lender.
                      Well, I did. Every one of 'em. Mostly I remember the last one. The wild finish. A guy standing on a station platform in the rain with a comical look in his face because his insides have been kicked out. -Rick

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by okiemom2008 View Post
                        Ok thanks everyone! The payment was made to her card(Chase) for the full amount. What sucks is that we cashed out our retirement plan because we hated owing anyone money and then now we are paying it again. Oh well....I guess that proves that we were not planning our bk filing by any means.

                        I am not bringing up that they should be after chase because I feel like Chase might pay them the 6k and go after my mom and then of course we pay it all.

                        What a nightmare!
                        I think it would be better to have chase go after your mom then to have the Government go after her.. Either way, you should let her know so she doesn't get blindsided.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          How was the transaction disclosed on the petition? Was mom listed as an unsecured creditor on Scedule F? The transaction would have been listed on Form 7 Section 2(c), correct?

                          I have a bad feeling about this. If the payment to your moms credit card card account was for the benefit of your mom, it may be possible for the trustee to still recover the payment from your mom because her credit card was not your debt. You owed that money to your mom, not her credit card. That mom borrowed the money from her credit card to lend to you is irrelevant. It could be viewed the same as if you deposited the $6K into her checking account. The fact that the money was credited to her credit card account and not a checking/savings account may not make a difference.

                          I hope I'm wrong.

                          In any case, the Trustee will hopefully be willing to settle and avoid involving your mom.

                          A payment can be both insider and preferential. The best way I have found to understand this is to look at the actual form on the petition.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            My guess is it has to be viewed as an insider payment. Otherwise people could just start dumping cash assests by paying off the credit card debt of friends and family with only have to wait 90 days.
                            Filed Chapter 7: 06/09/09
                            341 Meeting: 07/16/09
                            Discharged: 09/21/09
                            Case Closed: 09/25/09

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by OhioFiler View Post
                              If the debtor paid the creditor NOT mom, why would the trustee go after mom and not the creditor for the return of the preferential payment?
                              The creditor was mom's creditor, not the filer's. The filer has no signed financial relationship with mom's credit card company.
                              I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.

                              06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
                              06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
                              07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
                              10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
                              01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
                              09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
                              06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
                              08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !

                              10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
                              Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by lrprn View Post
                                The creditor was mom's creditor, not the filer's. The filer has no signed financial relationship with mom's credit card company.

                                But the asset was transferred to the bank. The bank is in possession of the asset. Tough one for me to get my brain around.
                                Well, I did. Every one of 'em. Mostly I remember the last one. The wild finish. A guy standing on a station platform in the rain with a comical look in his face because his insides have been kicked out. -Rick

                                Comment

                                bottom Ad Widget

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X