Did you pay the credit card or your Mom? This will make a difference in how the trustee goes after the money. If you paid the CC directly, then the trustee will just go after the CC company for the $6000. Of course then the CC company will come after your Mom for the money. Either way you're going to have to tell her so she knows what is coming her way. I agree that it was poor advice on your lawyers part not to have you wait a few more months for the 1 year look-back.
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Preferential Payment-Please HELP!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by woeisme View PostDid you pay the credit card or your Mom?Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NeedNewStart View PostCan you make some kind of payment plan with the trustee to pay it yourself?Filed Ch 7 -- July 9, 2008
341 mtg ---- August 14, 2008
Discharged ---- October 17, 2008
Closed --------- December 11, 2009!
Comment
-
Ok thanks everyone! The payment was made to her card(Chase) for the full amount. What sucks is that we cashed out our retirement plan because we hated owing anyone money and then now we are paying it again. Oh well....I guess that proves that we were not planning our bk filing by any means.
I am not bringing up that they should be after chase because I feel like Chase might pay them the 6k and go after my mom and then of course we pay it all.
What a nightmare!
Comment
-
Originally posted by StartingOver08 View PostThe lookback period for insider payments is one year. OP, I wonder why your attorney did not counsel you to wait a year to file?
Comment
-
They'll go after Chase not your mother if the payment was made directly to them. It's not an insider payment. It's a preferential payment.Well, I did. Every one of 'em. Mostly I remember the last one. The wild finish. A guy standing on a station platform in the rain with a comical look in his face because his insides have been kicked out. -Rick
Comment
-
Originally posted by OhioFiler View PostThey'll go after Chase not your mother if the payment was made directly to them. It's not an insider payment. It's a preferential payment.
Its either "insider" (1 year)
or "preferential" (90 days)
or is there something in between?
This really is an interesting question.
HHM?Filed Ch 7 -- July 9, 2008
341 mtg ---- August 14, 2008
Discharged ---- October 17, 2008
Closed --------- December 11, 2009!
Comment
-
Originally posted by PoorGrammyinBK7 View PostHow is it preferential if that long ago?
Its either "insider" (1 year)
or "preferential" (90 days)
or is there something in between?
This really is an interesting question.
HHM?
Good question.
Perhaps the courts don't recognize the debt to Chase as the petitioner's debt and the payment was made simply on the relative's (insider) behalf. That the court looks at the payment as a transfer to the insider by way of the lender.Well, I did. Every one of 'em. Mostly I remember the last one. The wild finish. A guy standing on a station platform in the rain with a comical look in his face because his insides have been kicked out. -Rick
Comment
-
Originally posted by okiemom2008 View PostOk thanks everyone! The payment was made to her card(Chase) for the full amount. What sucks is that we cashed out our retirement plan because we hated owing anyone money and then now we are paying it again. Oh well....I guess that proves that we were not planning our bk filing by any means.
I am not bringing up that they should be after chase because I feel like Chase might pay them the 6k and go after my mom and then of course we pay it all.
What a nightmare!
Comment
-
How was the transaction disclosed on the petition? Was mom listed as an unsecured creditor on Scedule F? The transaction would have been listed on Form 7 Section 2(c), correct?
I have a bad feeling about this. If the payment to your moms credit card card account was for the benefit of your mom, it may be possible for the trustee to still recover the payment from your mom because her credit card was not your debt. You owed that money to your mom, not her credit card. That mom borrowed the money from her credit card to lend to you is irrelevant. It could be viewed the same as if you deposited the $6K into her checking account. The fact that the money was credited to her credit card account and not a checking/savings account may not make a difference.
I hope I'm wrong.
In any case, the Trustee will hopefully be willing to settle and avoid involving your mom.
A payment can be both insider and preferential. The best way I have found to understand this is to look at the actual form on the petition.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OhioFiler View PostIf the debtor paid the creditor NOT mom, why would the trustee go after mom and not the creditor for the return of the preferential payment?I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.
06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !
10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go
Comment
-
Originally posted by lrprn View PostThe creditor was mom's creditor, not the filer's. The filer has no signed financial relationship with mom's credit card company.
But the asset was transferred to the bank. The bank is in possession of the asset. Tough one for me to get my brain around.Well, I did. Every one of 'em. Mostly I remember the last one. The wild finish. A guy standing on a station platform in the rain with a comical look in his face because his insides have been kicked out. -Rick
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment