Ok, so I double triple checked our original schedule as well as our amended (he jacked that one up too) and I see these accounts are on there however they aren't showing on the creditor matrix or the notice of recipients....am I correct in assuming then that they weren't notified? There are two that are not anywhere as well.
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Am I freaking out for no reason?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by BrokeAzzez View PostSorry, I pulled our credit reports to ensure that everything on there was indeed filed...I had a bad feeling (due to errors on attorney's part) that some stuff just didn't get included and I decided to cross reference. I know that nothing regarding the BK will show up on the credit reports yet, but I want to have them handy so I can get ready to get them updated later down the road. Sorry If I'm going to two differnet directions, I'm just really frustrated and tired of doing all the work when I paid this guy to handle this stuff.
You need to look at your actual filing, your matrix, via pacer. If they are not on the matrix then they are probably not listed.My comments are solely based on my opinion. The information and links that I have
posted are provided solely for informational purposes, and do not constitute legal advice
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrokeAzzez View PostOk, so I double triple checked our original schedule as well as our amended (he jacked that one up too) and I see these accounts are on there however they aren't showing on the creditor matrix or the notice of recipients....am I correct in assuming then that they weren't notified? There are two that are not anywhere as well.
Don't worry about the credit report let alone what is on it yet. You have years to look at that. After all bk is on your CR record for 10 years.My comments are solely based on my opinion. The information and links that I have
posted are provided solely for informational purposes, and do not constitute legal advice
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrokeAzzez View PostI give up ***Throwing hands in the the air*** meeting with attorney on Friday to spend yet more money to get these accounts added in before this closes. Cross my fingers that a second amendment might get it all.Filed: 11/25/08 - chp 7 no asset
Discharged: 2/24/09 CLOSED 3/7/09!
Comment
-
The only asset that the considered was my tax return... 2000 dollars. All else was abandoned. He said he didn't care about my credit reports, but I want to ensure that everything that I owe was included. We shall see. he has yet to respond to my request to verify that the accounts that I provided were or were not included correctly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrokeAzzez View PostThe only asset that the considered was my tax return... 2000 dollars. All else was abandoned. He said he didn't care about my credit reports, but I want to ensure that everything that I owe was included. We shall see. he has yet to respond to my request to verify that the accounts that I provided were or were not included correctly.Filed: 11/25/08 - chp 7 no asset
Discharged: 2/24/09 CLOSED 3/7/09!
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrokeAzzez View PostIt is crucial for the debtor to include all creditors in his schedules filed with the court. If a debtor knows of the creditor and does not schedule him, the creditor is denied participation in any distribution; to protect the creditor from this type of problem, the code provides that unscheduled claims may be non-dischargeable.
I just read this somewhere......Chapter 7 07/30/2008
341 09/17/2008
Discharge 11/21/2008
Comment
-
Originally posted by SubPrimeME View PostNice, I think there needs to be a quality grade outside of the atty's offices, kinda like restuarants were required to have. I swear so much of what I read on this forum is from atty's just being lazy, not caring or being stupid. I know there are plenty of great atty's out there, but still how does one really know what they are getting?! OK done ranting now...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tbornetun View PostI think that the main reason a lot of people end up on a forum like this is if they are having problems with an attorney. I am sure that the majority of people who have a great attorney and whos BKs are going smoothly are not seeking out advice from a forum. This may be the reason why you are seeing so many posts around here about lazy, uncaring, and stupid attorneys.
I did and have stayed because I know I can expect more honest, more timely, easily understandable answers to my concerns then I'd ever get from an attorney.
Anyone in the BK process who isn't reading here daily is cheating himself.Well, I did. Every one of 'em. Mostly I remember the last one. The wild finish. A guy standing on a station platform in the rain with a comical look in his face because his insides have been kicked out. -Rick
Comment
-
You just agreed with me, funny how you said you disagree.
Your second paragraph states exactly what I was trying to convey, "I know I can expect more honest, more timely, easily understandable answers to by concerns then I'd ever get from an attorney."
I was talking in general terms. I was speaking of the people posting all over the board about my stupid attorney this, my stupid attorney that. If you searched, I don't think you will find many posts that state. "I have the best attorney in the world, I understand everything they said 100%."
The previous posts were about frustration with attorneys. I wasn't referring to any of the pro se filers or the people you have not yet begun the process and are seeking information.
Comment
-
I only came on here beause I wasn't getting answers from my attorney. He is lazy and did the bear minimum to get me through this and yet here I should be excited that I'm discharged and I'm still stressed out because there is still stuff out there that wasn't filed. I lost my tax return becaues he didn't exempt any of it and it was too late. Small price to pay I guess, but I still worried that all his laziness will come back to haunt me some day.
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment