I bought a 2007 Honda Civic last January. I am paying $289/month on it and have never missed a payment, I kept paying it after stopping payment on all my other bills because I intend to keep it. We need a good car in Los Angeles, and I looked at used cars and it made more sense to buy a new one than a used one, considering the outrageous prices of used cars here. Also, I paid for the extended warranty so I should have no unexpected repairs for the next 5 years, which is a good thing.
So, my attorney says that if I keep paying the car, I should not have to reaffirm it. He says that in his experience over the past few years no one has ever reported to him that the Finance Co. reposessed their car after bankruptcy, as long as they made their payments on time. So he is advising against "reaffirming".
He says that if I reaffirm it means that if I walked away from the car I would still owe on it, whereas if I do not reaffirm, I could walk away from it, no problem, no debt owed.
However, on 2nd thought, that makes no sense to me. Why would I walk away from a car that I have some equity in already?
The car is listed at Kelly Blue book (kbb.com) as worth $17,475 in excellent condition (which it is; I've only driven it 3200 miles), and worth $16,475 in good condition.
The payoff amount on the car is $14,647. So I have almost $3k in equity in it already.
So, my question is, why wouldn't it be best to reaffirm it? Seems to me that by reaffirming it, I eliminate any chance of their repossessing it, and there is no way I am going to walk away from the car. If I discovered I could not make the payments for any reason, I would sell it and buy a cheaper car, using the equity towards the cheaper used car.
So, my question is:
Why is the attorney so keen on my not reaffirming?
If I do reaffirm, is there some disadvantage I don't know about? Can they raise the interest rate? (I got a decent rate, around 7-8%.)
Would it slow up my bankruptcy process if I reaffirm? Or would I still be (hopefully!) discharged fully after 60 days following my 341? What does reaffirming entail in terms of bureacracy, added costs, added meetings, etc., if any?
Please advise. I feel like my attorney is kind of railroading me into not reaffirming but I'm not sure that's true, it just feels that way because every time I've asked him about it he gives me the speech about how no one ever has repossessed a (non-reaffirmed) car in his experience, if the payments are made on time.
As usual, thanks for your feedback. I'd love to hear if anyone knows of anyone's car getting repossessed after bankruptcy even if they made payments on time.
Oh, and one more thing that concerns me, and I found this very odd:
I went to my Honda Finance page on the net to see how much I owed on the car, and the My Finance link (from my owner link page) has disappeared! It's as if I had never signed up for it. I have been paying via that link for the past 9 months or so, and now the link has disappeared from the page, and it is like it was before I signed up. I wonder if they want me to sign up again, as if that is some kind of "reaffirmation" on the debt, itself...? Anyone had this happen to them? (This is after I filed almost 2 weeks ago.)
So, my attorney says that if I keep paying the car, I should not have to reaffirm it. He says that in his experience over the past few years no one has ever reported to him that the Finance Co. reposessed their car after bankruptcy, as long as they made their payments on time. So he is advising against "reaffirming".
He says that if I reaffirm it means that if I walked away from the car I would still owe on it, whereas if I do not reaffirm, I could walk away from it, no problem, no debt owed.
However, on 2nd thought, that makes no sense to me. Why would I walk away from a car that I have some equity in already?
The car is listed at Kelly Blue book (kbb.com) as worth $17,475 in excellent condition (which it is; I've only driven it 3200 miles), and worth $16,475 in good condition.
The payoff amount on the car is $14,647. So I have almost $3k in equity in it already.
So, my question is, why wouldn't it be best to reaffirm it? Seems to me that by reaffirming it, I eliminate any chance of their repossessing it, and there is no way I am going to walk away from the car. If I discovered I could not make the payments for any reason, I would sell it and buy a cheaper car, using the equity towards the cheaper used car.
So, my question is:
Why is the attorney so keen on my not reaffirming?
If I do reaffirm, is there some disadvantage I don't know about? Can they raise the interest rate? (I got a decent rate, around 7-8%.)
Would it slow up my bankruptcy process if I reaffirm? Or would I still be (hopefully!) discharged fully after 60 days following my 341? What does reaffirming entail in terms of bureacracy, added costs, added meetings, etc., if any?
Please advise. I feel like my attorney is kind of railroading me into not reaffirming but I'm not sure that's true, it just feels that way because every time I've asked him about it he gives me the speech about how no one ever has repossessed a (non-reaffirmed) car in his experience, if the payments are made on time.
As usual, thanks for your feedback. I'd love to hear if anyone knows of anyone's car getting repossessed after bankruptcy even if they made payments on time.
Oh, and one more thing that concerns me, and I found this very odd:
I went to my Honda Finance page on the net to see how much I owed on the car, and the My Finance link (from my owner link page) has disappeared! It's as if I had never signed up for it. I have been paying via that link for the past 9 months or so, and now the link has disappeared from the page, and it is like it was before I signed up. I wonder if they want me to sign up again, as if that is some kind of "reaffirmation" on the debt, itself...? Anyone had this happen to them? (This is after I filed almost 2 weeks ago.)
Comment