Originally posted by alicias108
View Post
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
is it ok to return to work before discharge ?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by cindylynnsmith View PostBy the way, I've never been without a job a day in my life since I was 16! I am a high income earner and pay my fair share of taxes. I am FREE to stop working any day I would like just like the next person, but of choose not to! I just wanted to clear that up. I am in no way look for a free ride nor have I taken one. But in this country, one can choose to stop working any time he/she would like and of course suffer the consequences of that decision.
I should however apologize for calling you honey, that was rude. I just get very upset when others begin to be judgemental of ther members of this forum. It is just not right when we do not know all of the facts.Filed: 6-7-2010 341: 7-15-2010 DISCHARGED: 9/17/2010
Comment
-
Ok, everyone....differing opinions are clearly stated and there's no more to be said. Let's agree to disagree and get back to our real purpose....helping each other figure out the craziness of bankruptcy. 'Nuf said.I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.
06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !
10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go
Comment
-
RECENT CASES: Feb. 6. 2007
BAPCPA MADE IT EASIER TO WEED OUT BAD FAITH CHAPTER 7 DEBTORS BY CHANGING "SUBSTANTIAL ABUSE" TO "ABUSE"
CHAPTER 7 DEBTOR WHO FAILED TO AGGRESSIVELY SEEK EMPLOYEMENT PREPETITION WOULD HAVE CASE DISMISSED FOR "ABUSE" BASED ON "TOTALITY OF CIRCUMSTANCES" TEST
CASE MAY BE DISMISSED ON "ABUSE" GROUNDS OTHER THAN "PRESUMED ABUSE" BASED ON FAILURE TO PASS THE MEANS TEST
The court observed: " ... this Court concludes that a debtor who lacks the ability to pay because she has not engaged in a broad employment search, does not wish to work outside her chosen field, does not wish to work within her chosen field outside of southeastern Wisconsin, and takes this position at the expense of her creditors, abuses the provisions of Chapter 7 ..."
The court held, "The court concludes that it must look at the debtor's ability to pay her creditors at the time of the hearing on the motion to dismiss." " . . . it must delve further and find out why the debtor does not have the ability to pay. Finally, the Court concludes that if the debtor's inability to pay creditors is self-imposed, it may consider this fact ... in terms of the totality of the circumstances ..."
In re Richie, 353 B.R. 569 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Wis. 2006). Jeffrey A. Reitz, New Berlin, WI, for debtor. Pamela Pepper, Bankruptcy Judge.
____________________
Comment
-
Originally posted by lrprn View PostOk, everyone....differing opinions are clearly stated and there's no more to be said. Let's agree to disagree and get back to our real purpose....helping each other figure out the craziness of bankruptcy. 'Nuf said.Sarah H Owosso, MI
WE DID IT!! PRO SE
Filed 7/30/07 341 meeting 9/20/07 60 DAY CLUB 11/19/07!!! :yahoo::yahoo:
DISCHARGED!!! 11-26-07:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo: CLOSED 12-06-07 :yahoo::yahoo:
Comment
-
I recently filed chapter 7 and not working I directly asked my lawyer about returning to work.. He said that if the trustee asks me don't act to eager because they will wonder why I hadn't gone back sooner... I lost my job in March and also lost our house along with the MAJOR tax write off. So we had to adjust our with holdings. I can understand your feeling of frustration and "hunger" but it will be worth the wait!Filing January 08.
When a mistake becomes a lesson was it really a mistake?
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment