good point FO7, however, I think it depends on where you live. Honestly, here in Arizona it looks like almost everyone is going pro se even chpt 13. The day of my meeting only three people used lawyers (including that guy with holes in his shoes) and I am talking about for the entire day (because the list of meeting was out for anyone to view) only three people. I even looked at pacer and every case I looked at they were pro se.
My trustee looked annoyed everytime the lawyer tried to talk but that could mean other things.
I will admit, some cases really need assistance of a lawyer. I read some cases on pacer and I don't know how they closed without one, some cases were at first summons to be dismissed for huge amounts of asset found but some how the filer got discharge.
6ftlady, I am just so happy you got no assets. We are all on this boat together, the last thing I want to see is something go wrong.
My trustee looked annoyed everytime the lawyer tried to talk but that could mean other things.
I will admit, some cases really need assistance of a lawyer. I read some cases on pacer and I don't know how they closed without one, some cases were at first summons to be dismissed for huge amounts of asset found but some how the filer got discharge.
6ftlady, I am just so happy you got no assets. We are all on this boat together, the last thing I want to see is something go wrong.
Comment