Geesh now I am really confused.
There seems to be a lot of conflicting advice regarding these issues - especially the "consult a lawyer" issue. That seems to be the first piece of advice given by those who have been there and seems to be good, but if the date I visit an attorney is going to be held against me by creditors in regard to my last card use/payments made - I don't know if I want to see one until the day before I can afford one to hire. This is also very tricky if I take into consideration that a lot of the experienced filers here have said that patience is the best approach as well.
Should one stop using their CCs, be patient _then_ consult with a lawyer?
or
Should one consult with a lawyer - then do what he says? That had been my plan, but now I am terrified. Do consultations with lawyers you do not retain count?!
THIS also scares me -
(Quoting HHM )
It's the first time you consult with a lawyer. Also, some creditor attorneys are getting smart and asking people at their 341 meetings or at 2004 exams what websites they have visited, (i.e. like this one), etc to help establish the fact that the debtor is intentionally evading the presumption period.
Woah. I have been looking into BK info for a few months now because I did not know _anything_ about BK other than what had happened to me when playing Monopoly.
Also, does the balance transfer amount matter at all? What if you were merely using one BT check to pay minimum on one card to pay another? I can see how they might see this as fraud, but in my case I have been doing it just in the hope of not having to BK and leave everyone unpaid. Poor financial decision - I know- but if I had sound financial reasoning I would not be here to begin with, right? I did not see this as potantial fraud becasue I had NOT been looking into the information. (And judging from what HHM said they didn't want me to be looking into it)
I guess my bottom line is - what order is best to do? Who / what first?
Am I already too late by being here to begin with?
There seems to be a lot of conflicting advice regarding these issues - especially the "consult a lawyer" issue. That seems to be the first piece of advice given by those who have been there and seems to be good, but if the date I visit an attorney is going to be held against me by creditors in regard to my last card use/payments made - I don't know if I want to see one until the day before I can afford one to hire. This is also very tricky if I take into consideration that a lot of the experienced filers here have said that patience is the best approach as well.
Should one stop using their CCs, be patient _then_ consult with a lawyer?
or
Should one consult with a lawyer - then do what he says? That had been my plan, but now I am terrified. Do consultations with lawyers you do not retain count?!
THIS also scares me -
(Quoting HHM )
It's the first time you consult with a lawyer. Also, some creditor attorneys are getting smart and asking people at their 341 meetings or at 2004 exams what websites they have visited, (i.e. like this one), etc to help establish the fact that the debtor is intentionally evading the presumption period.
Woah. I have been looking into BK info for a few months now because I did not know _anything_ about BK other than what had happened to me when playing Monopoly.
Also, does the balance transfer amount matter at all? What if you were merely using one BT check to pay minimum on one card to pay another? I can see how they might see this as fraud, but in my case I have been doing it just in the hope of not having to BK and leave everyone unpaid. Poor financial decision - I know- but if I had sound financial reasoning I would not be here to begin with, right? I did not see this as potantial fraud becasue I had NOT been looking into the information. (And judging from what HHM said they didn't want me to be looking into it)
I guess my bottom line is - what order is best to do? Who / what first?
Am I already too late by being here to begin with?
Comment