Hey guys! Considering opening my case back up to reaffirm my first mortgage. What do you guys think? Are there more pros or cons?
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Should I re-open my case?
Collapse
X
-
What state do you live in? "Ride-through" really depends on state law. Even though the Bankruptcy Code doesn't recognize ride-through, the only consequence of not reaffirming is that the creditor is allowed to pursue their available remedies in nonbankruptcy law.DISCLAIMER: I am not an attorney. My posts are not legal advice. They are for information only. Please feel free to use them in an academic sense, as I simply wish to share with you what I have learned/researched.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bige1030 View PostWhat state do you live in? "Ride-through" really depends on state law. Even though the Bankruptcy Code doesn't recognize ride-through, the only consequence of not reaffirming is that the creditor is allowed to pursue their available remedies in nonbankruptcy law.
Comment
-
We didn't reaffirm our mortgage. We never heard a word from the mortgage folks. We did reaffirm our auto loan. We haven't had any problems with either. Our attorney initially said he didn't recommend any reaffirmations, but our car loan folks were really pushing it, so we did.
The only problem we had was that because our disposable was so low, the car loan folks said it would cause undue hardship and we had to go for a hearing before the judge. We had a letter from a relative stating they would insure the payment was made and he approved the reaffirmation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by saucey View PostHey guys! Considering opening my case back up to reaffirm my first mortgage. What do you guys think? Are there more pros or cons?
DonnaDonna
Filed Pro Se August 10,2006 :cry: 341 Meeting: September 19,2006 :blink: Last Day to Object: November 20,2006 :cool: Discharged: November 27,2006 :clapping: CLOSED: December 15,2006 :tongue:
Comment
-
I think you will be ok if you leave things as is. No need to reopen the case to just reaffirm. I know I have some fairly gloom and doom posts about not reaffirming, but the impact of not reaffirming has not been fully litigated. I imagine in the next couple years we will know better what the impact will be, especially when the real estate market, as a whole, begins to pick up.
I fear that, when the market turns around and homes begin to appreciate beyond what is owed, some of the more unscrupulous mortgage lenders, especially those holding 2nd mortgages, will buyout 1st mortgage that have not been reaffirmed, initiate foreclosure based solely on the fact that the debtor did not reaffirm. They will buy the house at auction and then try to sell the house on the open market to make a profit.
However, I think state courts (where this will be litigated) will have a hard time accepting the mere act of non-reaffirmation as a sufficient event of default to allow a mortgage note holder to foreclose, especially if the debtor is otherwise current on their payments. But there is a risk.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Naive-n-Texas View PostIs there a quick reference or glossary/index for the wording that is used in BK?
Like, disposable income
reaffirmation, etc..........
Enjoy having many of the definitions at your fingertips!I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.
06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !
10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment