Hi everyone.
My husband filed for Chapter 7 for his S-corp. The reason for the filing is that the S-corp is no longer active -- there are no assets -- and there is a nuisance law suit against the S-corp, which, while meritless, would be expense -- very expense -- to defend.
My husband did not want a judgement against his S-Corp, even though he plans to dissolve the S-corp. (I think this was more a point of honor for him than a business decision.)
His attorney told him that the litigation against the S-Corp could continue even if the S-corp was dissolved. But, the attorney said, if he filed for Chapter 7, listed the plantiff as a creditor, and got a discharge, then all litigation on the matter would stop not only during the Ch 7 proceeding, but thereafter.
The attorney filed the S-corp Ch 7 paper work in August and we went to the hearing on the matter last week.
What happened was sort of incredible.
The trustee almost laughed us out of the room. He said that the law does not allow for the discharge of debts for an asset-less S-corp in Chapter 7. His exact words were, "I don't know what you're doing here. There's nothing I can do for you. This is a non-event legally. Well, I guess I can file a no assets report for you."
So they swore in my husband, got his testimony on the record that his paperwork was accurate -- that the corp is assetless -- and then moved for a final decree with a no assets statement and no discharge.
My husband's attorney seemed genuinely shocked that there was no possibility of a discharge.
My question for the more legally qualified than me: Under the old law (pre-Oct. 2005) could S-corps get a discharge of debts? Is this no-discharge for S-corps new, or has it always been like this?
Thanks for any light you can shed on this legal absurdity.
Baffled
My husband filed for Chapter 7 for his S-corp. The reason for the filing is that the S-corp is no longer active -- there are no assets -- and there is a nuisance law suit against the S-corp, which, while meritless, would be expense -- very expense -- to defend.
My husband did not want a judgement against his S-Corp, even though he plans to dissolve the S-corp. (I think this was more a point of honor for him than a business decision.)
His attorney told him that the litigation against the S-Corp could continue even if the S-corp was dissolved. But, the attorney said, if he filed for Chapter 7, listed the plantiff as a creditor, and got a discharge, then all litigation on the matter would stop not only during the Ch 7 proceeding, but thereafter.
The attorney filed the S-corp Ch 7 paper work in August and we went to the hearing on the matter last week.
What happened was sort of incredible.
The trustee almost laughed us out of the room. He said that the law does not allow for the discharge of debts for an asset-less S-corp in Chapter 7. His exact words were, "I don't know what you're doing here. There's nothing I can do for you. This is a non-event legally. Well, I guess I can file a no assets report for you."
So they swore in my husband, got his testimony on the record that his paperwork was accurate -- that the corp is assetless -- and then moved for a final decree with a no assets statement and no discharge.
My husband's attorney seemed genuinely shocked that there was no possibility of a discharge.
My question for the more legally qualified than me: Under the old law (pre-Oct. 2005) could S-corps get a discharge of debts? Is this no-discharge for S-corps new, or has it always been like this?
Thanks for any light you can shed on this legal absurdity.
Baffled
Comment