My mortgage lender's attorney has filed a motion to lift the stay. Once lifted, I am assuming they can move forward on things. My question is: Once this happens, should I just let it foreclose or try and go about a DIL? I am out of the home (have been for awhile), and am more than willing to hand over the keys to them to get this thing out of my name. Is this possible, or would it cause more issues than just letting it foreclose?
I understand the BK takes care of the deficiencies on my end regardless. There is an issue that could come up though. My ex spouse is still also on the loan. He is aware of what is going on. BUT in the divorce it states he is held harmless of anything regarding the house (he did a quit claim to get off the title). SO......if they go after a deficiency, he could sue me for it anyway per the divorce decree. That is why I am wondering if somehow doing a DIL may help that not happen.
The home is underwater and needs major repairs, but the deficiency would not be over 30K I would guess.
Just trying to figure out what is the best option. Any advise would be greatly appreciated.
I understand the BK takes care of the deficiencies on my end regardless. There is an issue that could come up though. My ex spouse is still also on the loan. He is aware of what is going on. BUT in the divorce it states he is held harmless of anything regarding the house (he did a quit claim to get off the title). SO......if they go after a deficiency, he could sue me for it anyway per the divorce decree. That is why I am wondering if somehow doing a DIL may help that not happen.
The home is underwater and needs major repairs, but the deficiency would not be over 30K I would guess.
Just trying to figure out what is the best option. Any advise would be greatly appreciated.
Comment