I am about halfway through my 5-yr plan. I've been doing ok. In fact, I would say that I have been thriving if not for the car expenses that have depleted the emergency fund I managed to save (new transmission - $800; new tires on car 1 $750; new tires on car 2, $600; Brakes $300, $180 2 new batteries) - that's $2500+ right there.
However, I am about to get hit with something entirely unanticipated. Has anyone seen this before?:
I get paid bi-weekly, with my BK payment garnished and automatically sent to the Trustee. The rest of my check is direct-deposited into my checking account. I get paid every other Friday, for the payroll period ending that same Friday. Or at least that's the way it used to work.
The other day, I learned that my company is converging several different payroll systems from sister divisions. Although the payment will continue to be every other Friday (on the same Friday), instead of being paid Friday for the payroll period that ends that same Friday, I will now be paid Friday for the "new" payroll period that ends the *previous* Friday. The practical impact to me is that on an upcoming Friday payday (in August), I will only receive 1 week's pay (instead of 2). Thereafter, the pay will be aligned, and I will receive the normal 2 week's pay. When my employment ends (maybe 2 months from now, maybe 20 years from now), I will receive the "extra" week's pay that they are adjusting now.
To me, this seems like they are taking a 0% interest, indefinite loan from me. The impact will be significant, as the court-ordered garnishment will still be deducted from my 1/2 check, as will (presumably) my other deductions (health insurance, HSA, etc.). This is the equivalent of losing half my paycheck.
In recognition that this may create a hardship for some employees, the company has offered to provide a "transition check" in the offset amount and then deduct 1/6 of the amount "loaned" for the next 6 pay periods, to spread the impact over 12 weeks. That's fine and dandy, but that means a significant shortfall on 6 pay periods, when I've managed to just stay afloat for 2 1/2 years.
I'm thinking about speaking with the Payroll Department, and telling them that a) they are required by federal law to continue to make the court-ordered payment, b) I am required by federal law to turn over any disposable income, and c) I am prohibited by law from assuming debt of greater than $500 without Court permission.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
However, I am about to get hit with something entirely unanticipated. Has anyone seen this before?:
I get paid bi-weekly, with my BK payment garnished and automatically sent to the Trustee. The rest of my check is direct-deposited into my checking account. I get paid every other Friday, for the payroll period ending that same Friday. Or at least that's the way it used to work.
The other day, I learned that my company is converging several different payroll systems from sister divisions. Although the payment will continue to be every other Friday (on the same Friday), instead of being paid Friday for the payroll period that ends that same Friday, I will now be paid Friday for the "new" payroll period that ends the *previous* Friday. The practical impact to me is that on an upcoming Friday payday (in August), I will only receive 1 week's pay (instead of 2). Thereafter, the pay will be aligned, and I will receive the normal 2 week's pay. When my employment ends (maybe 2 months from now, maybe 20 years from now), I will receive the "extra" week's pay that they are adjusting now.
To me, this seems like they are taking a 0% interest, indefinite loan from me. The impact will be significant, as the court-ordered garnishment will still be deducted from my 1/2 check, as will (presumably) my other deductions (health insurance, HSA, etc.). This is the equivalent of losing half my paycheck.
In recognition that this may create a hardship for some employees, the company has offered to provide a "transition check" in the offset amount and then deduct 1/6 of the amount "loaned" for the next 6 pay periods, to spread the impact over 12 weeks. That's fine and dandy, but that means a significant shortfall on 6 pay periods, when I've managed to just stay afloat for 2 1/2 years.
I'm thinking about speaking with the Payroll Department, and telling them that a) they are required by federal law to continue to make the court-ordered payment, b) I am required by federal law to turn over any disposable income, and c) I am prohibited by law from assuming debt of greater than $500 without Court permission.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Comment