top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How BAPCPA screwed the middle class by forcing CH 13's

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    How BAPCPA screwed the middle class by forcing CH 13's

    excerpt from http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters...ass_conundrum/


    ....Middle class Americans cannot receive a Chapter 7 discharge because they earn a steady income (or are stuck in the “gap period”), they are being forced to bear the burden of health care costs, their home states are utilizing money earmarked for relief and they will also be required to pay higher taxes unless immediate action is taken.

    The issue du jour regarding these matters is why do we care? Should the country be concerned that the only relief available to the middle class is through a Chapter 13 case dedicating their supposedly “disposable income” through a plan for the next 3-5 years? Resoundingly, the answer is yes.

    The middle class is not undertaking to commit a fraud against their creditors. The middle class has unquestionably been pummeled from higher medical costs, unmatched job loss, reduction in income, higher taxes and banks that are unwilling or unable to refinance indebtedness with respect to property underwater. As credit scores erode with the incurrence of medical debt, consumer debt, mortgage debt, or otherwise insurmountable debt; the cost to the middle class increase, leading to insolvency notwithstanding incomes above the state median.

    These are the innocent debtors that the Bankruptcy Code was intended to provide a “fresh start.” But, as the law currently stands, these debtors are trapped unless action is taken.

    It seems to us that the right thing to undertake at this time is to revisit BAPCPA to facilitate debt reduction to allow middle class individuals and families who have suffered in the recent economic crisis to attempt to discharge their indebtedness. The financial burden of BAPCPA on the middle class has greatly outweighed the purported fraud prevention benefits. The Bankruptcy Code and those entrusted with its protection are already empowered to prosecute fraud through Sections523 and 727 of the Bankruptcy Code. The current economic crisis has brought to light the limitations of BAPCPA and immediate changes to the Bankruptcy Code are required to restore the middle class and revitalize their purchasing power.

    The middle class is in desperate need of financial breathing room from the economic policies preventing its growth. Revisions to the Bankruptcy Code, including the elimination of the Means Test, reducing the discharge bar to 6 years, strengthening the powers of Section 707(b)(3) and raising the debt limits in Chapter 13, will undoubtedly alleviate the financial squeeze placed on the middle class as well as to facilitate buying power for the shrinking middle class.

    The government policies explored above — the Means Test, extended discharge period, higher medical costs, diversion of settlement funds and higher taxes — have created a virtual economic debtor prison incarcerating the middle class for the foreseeable future. There are numerous policy issues for the lending and medical communities that are at risk here and the impact of any potential revision of the Bankruptcy Code cannot be minimized.

    However, the middle class is the engine for the growth of our economy in the United States. The impact of the recession continues to harm those who have carried this country for decades and to continue to force those who can never repay their bills into an economic incarceration does not seem fair, right or American.
    Filed CH 7 Sept. 2011 - UST Motion to Dismiss (presumption of abuse) Dec. 2011 - Converted to CH 13 Feb. 2012 - Plan Confirmation May 2012 - Expected Discharge June 2017

    #2
    Interesting, It will be interesting to see how many of the 2005 people will file again at the end of this year.
    chpt 7 ,5-2009

    Comment


      #3
      i know this: when we were seeking to hire an atty to file our bk, we were experiencing the gambit of opinions, however, the majority tried to push us into a chapter 13. not that i am for or against chapter 13's. it's just our situation was based on the only income was "exempt" and a chunk of the income at the time was unemployment insurance.

      one atty here in florida was so angry and was outraged from what we were rec'ing from our UI! we explained to him that we had collectively worked 90 years and in the state we came from they took it our of our paychecks for years...decades for that matter. he went on to say he's tired of paying it for his employees and on and on...we didn't even understand his angry. LOL! he certainly wasn't the atty for us.

      i know had we been pushed into a 13, as soon as the UI stopped, we would have had to rehire an atty and file chapter 7. it would have choked us and backed us into a corner we could have never gotten out of. i know it works for many people, but i think it depends on where they are in their life time. neither of us have been able nor most likely ever will be able to make six figures again, our jobs have been eliminated and we have been replaced by unqualified cheaper replacements.

      again 13's are excellent for many, i do believe many attys and trustees simply do not care what happens to the those that have a greater chance to fail since they are being held by such a tight leash. both the attys and trustees do care about their pockets and filling them when they can. i'm not saying all or even many attys are that way, however, with every 13 that goes through, it's more money for both the atty and the trustee and as time has gone on, i have seen more and more people pushed into 13's that really could have qualified for a 7.
      8/4/2008 MAKE SURE AND VISIT Tobee's Blogs! http://www.bkforum.com/blog.php?32727-tobee43 and all are welcome to bk forum's Florida State Questions and Answers on BK http://www.bkforum.com/group.php?groupid=9

      Comment

      bottom Ad Widget

      Collapse
      Working...
      X