I am about to file a chapter 13. I will be put into a 5 year plan. I have talked to my attorney about buying a car prior to filing and he said it is fine, go ahead, just make sure the payment is under $500/month.
here is one issue. i haven't aske dmy lawyer this question.. i can on Monday, but I wanted to see what people here thought.
given that I have stopped paying a lot of my creditors.. my credit rating is probably in the toilet. so if i tried to get a car loan, i'm sure the rate i would get is horrible. that severely impacts the payment and makes it harder to get a good car at the $500/month price point.
the price point of cars i am looking at are in the 25-28k range. depending on the interest rate I can get - the monthly payment will either be just UNDER or just OVER the $500 threshhold. (i have a small amount of equity in my current car, so when i trade it in, it will count as a small downpayment.. maybe 3-4k)
suppose that I find a car that i like.. but the rate I get quoted from the subprime lender is 15% or 20% - that makes the car payment come out to $575. my lawyer indicated that if I buy a newer car prior to filnig, but the car payment is over $500 it will cause problems.. they could try to force me to sell it, not keep it to approve my plan.
if I could qualify for a standard/normal used car rate like 5-8%, the cars i'm looking at would easily be under $500/month over 72 months.
if I buy a car, but get poor financing, and the car payment i sign up for is OVER $500/month, but it COULD be under $500/month if the rate was reduced or the term extended - does the BK court intervene to adjust any of these factors? would they force the interest rate down? or would they not do that at all?
I don't want to go out and spend too much on a replacement car only to piss of the trustee, and run the risk of losing it.. but i don't want to sell myself short and buy a car that is too cheap... the whole point of truying to buy a car before filing is to not only have a newer/more reliable car, and at the end of the plan, i'll have a car that is newer/worth more than the one i have now. i'm only looking at low mileage, reliable, practical cars.. but if I can get one that costs 28k instead of one that costs 22k, it will all benefit me...
if I have to just keep my exisiting car, that is fine too.
let me know if you think the BK court would intervene / take over that new car loan and somehow modify or force the terms to adjust so that the interest rate would be reduced to a better rate?
thanks.
here is one issue. i haven't aske dmy lawyer this question.. i can on Monday, but I wanted to see what people here thought.
given that I have stopped paying a lot of my creditors.. my credit rating is probably in the toilet. so if i tried to get a car loan, i'm sure the rate i would get is horrible. that severely impacts the payment and makes it harder to get a good car at the $500/month price point.
the price point of cars i am looking at are in the 25-28k range. depending on the interest rate I can get - the monthly payment will either be just UNDER or just OVER the $500 threshhold. (i have a small amount of equity in my current car, so when i trade it in, it will count as a small downpayment.. maybe 3-4k)
suppose that I find a car that i like.. but the rate I get quoted from the subprime lender is 15% or 20% - that makes the car payment come out to $575. my lawyer indicated that if I buy a newer car prior to filnig, but the car payment is over $500 it will cause problems.. they could try to force me to sell it, not keep it to approve my plan.
if I could qualify for a standard/normal used car rate like 5-8%, the cars i'm looking at would easily be under $500/month over 72 months.
if I buy a car, but get poor financing, and the car payment i sign up for is OVER $500/month, but it COULD be under $500/month if the rate was reduced or the term extended - does the BK court intervene to adjust any of these factors? would they force the interest rate down? or would they not do that at all?
I don't want to go out and spend too much on a replacement car only to piss of the trustee, and run the risk of losing it.. but i don't want to sell myself short and buy a car that is too cheap... the whole point of truying to buy a car before filing is to not only have a newer/more reliable car, and at the end of the plan, i'll have a car that is newer/worth more than the one i have now. i'm only looking at low mileage, reliable, practical cars.. but if I can get one that costs 28k instead of one that costs 22k, it will all benefit me...
if I have to just keep my exisiting car, that is fine too.
let me know if you think the BK court would intervene / take over that new car loan and somehow modify or force the terms to adjust so that the interest rate would be reduced to a better rate?
thanks.
Comment