Okay so a Motion for relief was filed 1/19. After gettting the attorney payment history and a mortgage company payment history I see they are not on the same page at all! Yet I'm going to be the one to pay.
Aug.09 I had a agreed order and I paid what I was told by the lawyer. I had to make a lump payment and 6 stip payments. Well I did that.
After I added it up today it was not enough to settle the agreed order amount. I found the order and it doesn't say 6 months it just says until payments are cured. Well I never knew this till now.
The mortgage company showed me 1 month behind online sense 09 order but told me no I was showing current it was just due to how they post it. That was until Aug 2011 when they reversed our payment and applied a attorney fee (so that made me 2 months behind). There attorney payments history showed us 2 months behind. The attorney history doesn't show this reversed payment so that made them seem on track with each other.
All this started end of sept (told me motion was filed and really only referred). Oct they said it was reversed so I made payment and then next day it was filed again. When really it was only referred. So I stopped making payments until they fix all this and after many many phone calls to mortgage company and calls trying to get attorney to handle this they finally filed Motion.
Now according to attorney payment schedule I feel I probably owe the payments they say b/c last order put us behind. But after all this I dont think I should have to pay the 826.00 attorney fee they are charging me with.
Am I wrong? Should I have done things differently? Do you think they dropped the ball or I did?
Oh and back in 09 when we had a agreed order it was b/c the mortgage company rep told us we was caught up on our mortgage till April after we paid our jan. payment. We was like okay great! So didn't pay Feb and March and resumed payments in April. Of course no one had record of that. I see now on paper work why the rep may have thought we was paid till April.
Sorry so long!
Aug.09 I had a agreed order and I paid what I was told by the lawyer. I had to make a lump payment and 6 stip payments. Well I did that.
After I added it up today it was not enough to settle the agreed order amount. I found the order and it doesn't say 6 months it just says until payments are cured. Well I never knew this till now.
The mortgage company showed me 1 month behind online sense 09 order but told me no I was showing current it was just due to how they post it. That was until Aug 2011 when they reversed our payment and applied a attorney fee (so that made me 2 months behind). There attorney payments history showed us 2 months behind. The attorney history doesn't show this reversed payment so that made them seem on track with each other.
All this started end of sept (told me motion was filed and really only referred). Oct they said it was reversed so I made payment and then next day it was filed again. When really it was only referred. So I stopped making payments until they fix all this and after many many phone calls to mortgage company and calls trying to get attorney to handle this they finally filed Motion.
Now according to attorney payment schedule I feel I probably owe the payments they say b/c last order put us behind. But after all this I dont think I should have to pay the 826.00 attorney fee they are charging me with.
Am I wrong? Should I have done things differently? Do you think they dropped the ball or I did?
Oh and back in 09 when we had a agreed order it was b/c the mortgage company rep told us we was caught up on our mortgage till April after we paid our jan. payment. We was like okay great! So didn't pay Feb and March and resumed payments in April. Of course no one had record of that. I see now on paper work why the rep may have thought we was paid till April.
Sorry so long!
Comment