Anyone ever have an objection that your plan shouldn't be confirmed becauseyour home should be sold because it benefits the creditors (ex and his attorney) more than if you successfully complete your Chapter 13 plan? [11 U.S.C. 543 (a)]
IF the house is sold in this not-at -arms length transaction, I wouldn't even get my homestead exemption as the family court wouldn't stop to validate the invalid judgment liens (put on the house by ex and his attorney against fam court orders).
My plan includes keeping the house as I'm allowed to buy out ex-s share per state court orders and the buyout will cost less than the cost of renting. Plus, if I then improve the property, I can sell it for twice the friend's offer and thus pay off my debts. As it is my only nonexempt asset, if the house is sold, I have no way to pay off unsecureds (and ex will be the major unsecured tho he seems not to know it)
If for some reason my 13 isn't confirmed, shouldn't I have the right to convert to a 7, as the house is my only asset, and let the 7 Trustee sell the house in an open market instead of to ex's friend?
IF the house is sold in this not-at -arms length transaction, I wouldn't even get my homestead exemption as the family court wouldn't stop to validate the invalid judgment liens (put on the house by ex and his attorney against fam court orders).
My plan includes keeping the house as I'm allowed to buy out ex-s share per state court orders and the buyout will cost less than the cost of renting. Plus, if I then improve the property, I can sell it for twice the friend's offer and thus pay off my debts. As it is my only nonexempt asset, if the house is sold, I have no way to pay off unsecureds (and ex will be the major unsecured tho he seems not to know it)
If for some reason my 13 isn't confirmed, shouldn't I have the right to convert to a 7, as the house is my only asset, and let the 7 Trustee sell the house in an open market instead of to ex's friend?
Comment