Greetings to all, we did our first modification to our 5 year plan and trustee does not agree with our lawyer proposed new payment. The trustee proposed a higher amount stating that this would make the plan go over 60 months (ours would).The reason we did this is because we have stopped recieving childsupport payments effecting our income.I think the next step would be for a judge to make a ruling. If so can this amount still be lowered? just some general thoughts we have. Any help would be great. thanks
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
plan modify in deny
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by UNDERMICH View Post...we did our first modification to our 5 year plan and trustee does not agree with our lawyer proposed new payment. The trustee proposed a higher amount stating that this would make the plan go over 60 months (ours would).The reason we did this is because we have stopped recieving child support payments effecting our income.
I think the next step would be for a judge to make a ruling. If so can this amount still be lowered?
What happens with your payment will depend on what kind of agreement is reached by your trustee and lawyer. If they can't agree, how the judge rules on the briefs supporting each side will be the final decision-maker for your payment amount.I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.
06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !
10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go
-
Thanks for the reply IRPRN.. just sounds odd that the trustee says the the plan may go over 60 months causing the plan to be discharged. How than in 5 years change anything in a plan you have life changes, child becomes a teen (needs car) , our car breaks down (need new one) . just seems like a bad come back from the trustee.
Comment
-
Originally posted by UNDERMICH View PostThanks for the reply IRPRN.. just sounds odd that the trustee says the the plan may go over 60 months causing the plan to be discharged. How than in 5 years change anything in a plan you have life changes, child becomes a teen (needs car) , our car breaks down (need new one) . just seems like a bad come back from the trustee.19% dividend
Comment
-
Concerned
Hello, I am currently trying to modify my chapter 13 plan since my child support has stopped. When they originally set up our payment they used child support in the amount of income that we received an determined the payment with me receiving it. My option is that child support should not have been included since it is not steady.(I have only received 1 1/2 years worth in 14 1/2 years). So when the modification was sent to the Trustee, she is stated that our plan is a pot plan not a precentage plan, and she is trying to get the judge to deny the modification. She stated that the decrease in payment would make the plan go out of 60 months and we would be in violation.
How can they use a income that is not steady to be included in our monthly payment and when that income stops not modify the payment to be lowered. Sometimes I think they do not want you to suceed at the plan and that all the money you pay them goes into there pockets. I wonder if I made the right decision in filing!!Last edited by UNDERMICH; 02-18-2010, 04:02 PM.
Comment
-
It sounds like you are only paying enough to cover priority debt, secured debt, and pre-petition arrears, which is why your payment amount can not be lowered. As your trustee mentioned, your plan can not go past 60 months, this is a clear part of the BK law and there is no amount of negotiation that can change that.
If you can't afford everything you will need to look at surrendering some of your secured property to eliminate some of the debt that needs to be repaid.Filed CH13 - 06/2009
Confirmed - 01/2010
Comment
-
Originally posted by SVO351 View PostThey should not have included child support payments in your income. Ours didnt...the childrens father hadnt paid since April 2009 and we told our attorney that. He did not include that income in our calculations.
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment