I believe the insider issues are only in regards to repayment of debt, or giving assets below fair value. Since it sold for fair value, the only issue I see is properly accounting for the $8,000 so it's considered exempt (or properly spent, if you already spent it). Right off the top you can figure your attorney's fees.
So in your case instead of the car being property of the estate, there's this mystical $8,000 that is property of the estate -- and you need to be able to explain/exempt where it went.
Worst case? Like the others said, let the trustee go after it.
Am I the only one really bothered by the statement that the attorney wanted your father to sign to agree to make the plan payment for you???
Waahh? It's not his BK. It's not his payment plan. It's not his debt. Where the heck would he get this magical idea that your father can be contracted to pay it for you in a BK proceeding??
That seems so illogical to me that I must be missing something. I can't see how a lawyer would say that.
So in your case instead of the car being property of the estate, there's this mystical $8,000 that is property of the estate -- and you need to be able to explain/exempt where it went.
Worst case? Like the others said, let the trustee go after it.
Am I the only one really bothered by the statement that the attorney wanted your father to sign to agree to make the plan payment for you???
Waahh? It's not his BK. It's not his payment plan. It's not his debt. Where the heck would he get this magical idea that your father can be contracted to pay it for you in a BK proceeding??
That seems so illogical to me that I must be missing something. I can't see how a lawyer would say that.
Comment