I'm doing a 13 Pro Se soon and have read that the National Assn of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys has filed briefs in support of the argument that vehicle ownership expenses should be allowed even where none exist because cars do wear out. I have a 1999 Escort with 105K and a 02 Caravan with 65k on it. Both are paid for, and our credit is shot and we have no cash (hence the Pro Se) to buy something, sooooo it would be stellar to have the court recognize that we'll need at least one or two new cars in the next five years. Does anyone have any experience claiming this expense? Thanks!
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Claiming Vehicle Ownership Expense
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by HHM View PostNot sure about the ownership cost issue, but for cars older than 6 years or have more than 80,000 miles, the IRS standards allow an additional $200 in vehicle operating cost.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HHM View PostThat little provision is so buried in the IRM (Internal Revenue Manual) most people don't know about it, but I am pretty sure the BK courts allow the extra operationg expense. It is mentioned here
5.8.5.6.3 (09-23-2008)
Treatment of Non-Business Transportation Expenses
http://www.irs.gov/irm/part5/ch08s05.htmlBk #1 (DP) Filed Ch 7 Pro Se on Feb 28, 2013 ~ 341 on Apr 19, 2013 ~ Discharged on Jun 13, 2013
Bk #2 (Self) Filed Ch 7 Pro Se on May 5, 2013 ~ 341 on Jun 14, 2013
Comment
-
The Trustee Guide shows that the Operating Expense can be increased by $200 (monthly) to cover a motor vehicle at least 6 model years old or 75,000 miles... just as HHM wrote.
The Trustee Guide goes further to read that you can't take the Ownership expense unless you lease or are financing the vehicle.Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment