This is a subject that no one dares bring up - Is it ever worthwhile to own a home if it means you will inevitably have to file BK13 ? (as in our case.)
Isn't it better to just continue to rent (as we should have) if you don't have the financial resources and sweat equity skills to restore or fix up an investor dump and thus avoid a five year bk13 sentence?
Would all of you go ahead and buy a house you don't even like (as we did) knowing you will have to file? (which we never dreamed would be our fate).
I know most posters on here seem hell bent on owning a home regardless of the repercussions and appear ready to repeat BK13 as many times as necessary just to maintain home ownership and furthermore, seem resigned to staying in the same town , state and country after their first BK13?
Why do filers see change as such a dirty word?
In our case, once the Bk13 ends, if we don't sell quickly we will be facing 5+ years of deferred updates and repairs to offset a lesser level of home neglect in this 1975 model than the 1963 run down money pit that drove us mercilessly into Bk13 in the first place. In four years, our current home will be the same age in building years as the fixer-upper was , and it will need a complete systems and interior overhaul (which I am not prepared to sacrifice any more of my life to) which would easily replace the BK13 plan as a permanent ongoing payment. I no longer like this layout, particularly the stairs, small closets and small outdated bathrooms, and of course the 12 more year solar panel lease.
When you look at rental houses in another state and find nicer, more modern designed and equipped homes for rent at only a little more than your overpriced mortgage currently costs, it's got to be time to move!
Isn't it better to just continue to rent (as we should have) if you don't have the financial resources and sweat equity skills to restore or fix up an investor dump and thus avoid a five year bk13 sentence?
Would all of you go ahead and buy a house you don't even like (as we did) knowing you will have to file? (which we never dreamed would be our fate).
I know most posters on here seem hell bent on owning a home regardless of the repercussions and appear ready to repeat BK13 as many times as necessary just to maintain home ownership and furthermore, seem resigned to staying in the same town , state and country after their first BK13?
Why do filers see change as such a dirty word?
In our case, once the Bk13 ends, if we don't sell quickly we will be facing 5+ years of deferred updates and repairs to offset a lesser level of home neglect in this 1975 model than the 1963 run down money pit that drove us mercilessly into Bk13 in the first place. In four years, our current home will be the same age in building years as the fixer-upper was , and it will need a complete systems and interior overhaul (which I am not prepared to sacrifice any more of my life to) which would easily replace the BK13 plan as a permanent ongoing payment. I no longer like this layout, particularly the stairs, small closets and small outdated bathrooms, and of course the 12 more year solar panel lease.
When you look at rental houses in another state and find nicer, more modern designed and equipped homes for rent at only a little more than your overpriced mortgage currently costs, it's got to be time to move!
Comment