I am definitely not very wise when it comes to mathematics, or avoiding debt (hence the bankruptcy), however, I am just a little bit confused about the actual payback percentage in my chapter 13 which changed significantly after I received an inheritance a couple of years ago.
I am now near the final year of a five year plan.
My original base plan was 34,000 as to which 23,000 was secured debt to be fully paid back at 100 percent and the remaining amount going to about 30,000 in unsecured debt (resulting in a low percentage payback) after also considering lawyer fees and trustee fees as well.
Since the inheritance (right around 17,000) , my base plan has bolstered up to around 55,000 with all secured debt (23,000) being paid back and the rest going to the 30,000 in unsecured debt.
Now technically 23,000 in secured debt and 30,000 in unsecured debt equals 53,000 and since my plan is 55,000 you would think I was in a 100 percent payback plan. But add in the lawer fees (3,600) and trustee fees (seems to be 3,000 as he is taking out more and more each payment that is made (now up to 25 dollars each payment going to him) and so technically I suppose I am short of paying back 100 percent. But I would like someone to confirm that.
What sucks, is that if I am like at a 95 percent payback percentage, it almost makes more sense just to jump up to the full 100 percent where rules get a little looser (for instance at the end of the five year plan, I am a little short, I could pull from my 401k in a 100 percent plan to finish everything off) as opposed to being in a 95 percent payback plan where I likely would not be allowed to turn to a 401k for relief at the end, because they would look at that as money that should still be going to unsecured debt.
Any help/assistance with this would be appreciated.
I have always felt like the unexpected inheritance was a curse, that I never wanted to accept to begin with, but was told that since I was in a bankruptcy when my relative suddenly passed, I had no choice but to accept it because it was technically the bankruptcy's money not mine to begin with.
I am now near the final year of a five year plan.
My original base plan was 34,000 as to which 23,000 was secured debt to be fully paid back at 100 percent and the remaining amount going to about 30,000 in unsecured debt (resulting in a low percentage payback) after also considering lawyer fees and trustee fees as well.
Since the inheritance (right around 17,000) , my base plan has bolstered up to around 55,000 with all secured debt (23,000) being paid back and the rest going to the 30,000 in unsecured debt.
Now technically 23,000 in secured debt and 30,000 in unsecured debt equals 53,000 and since my plan is 55,000 you would think I was in a 100 percent payback plan. But add in the lawer fees (3,600) and trustee fees (seems to be 3,000 as he is taking out more and more each payment that is made (now up to 25 dollars each payment going to him) and so technically I suppose I am short of paying back 100 percent. But I would like someone to confirm that.
What sucks, is that if I am like at a 95 percent payback percentage, it almost makes more sense just to jump up to the full 100 percent where rules get a little looser (for instance at the end of the five year plan, I am a little short, I could pull from my 401k in a 100 percent plan to finish everything off) as opposed to being in a 95 percent payback plan where I likely would not be allowed to turn to a 401k for relief at the end, because they would look at that as money that should still be going to unsecured debt.
Any help/assistance with this would be appreciated.
I have always felt like the unexpected inheritance was a curse, that I never wanted to accept to begin with, but was told that since I was in a bankruptcy when my relative suddenly passed, I had no choice but to accept it because it was technically the bankruptcy's money not mine to begin with.
Comment