I am a Chptr 13 case in Oregon. I am wondering if each BK court will rule independently on this or if it will be for the entire system, seeing as this is a national emergency rather.
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stimulus check Chapter 13?
Collapse
X
-
I am in Oregon as well, through the Portland court.
while I definitely would like to hang onto any stimulus check, aren’t they bound by the letter of the law, or is some discretion applied?
This entire situation will likely throw many people out of work for months. I hope all who are in a Ch 13 plan can survive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scottowl View Postwhile I definitely would like to hang onto any stimulus check, aren’t they bound by the letter of the law, or is some discretion applied?
Now, I would say that a Trustee who would go after a stimulus check, especially since it's not really that big, is simply too authoritarian for me. They are rushing these things through so fast, that they are leaving out all the safety measures into these rapidly developed legislative bills.
Originally posted by Scottowl View PostThis entire situation will likely throw many people out of work for months. I hope all who are in a Ch 13 plan can survive.
Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
-
Im on a CH13 payment plan now (2 years in). They will have to pry that money from my cold dead fingers if they want it.. Seriously though, my income is being cut in half probably for the next 2 months at least so they can t tell me its "extra" income.. Wont be enough to make me whole for a month. If a trustee pushes anyone for this money, they deserve a good swift kick in the nuts.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by BKinMaine View PostIm on a CH13 payment plan now (2 years in). They will have to pry that money from my cold dead fingers if they want it.. Seriously though, my income is being cut in half probably for the next 2 months at least so they can t tell me its "extra" income.. Wont be enough to make me whole for a month. If a trustee pushes anyone for this money, they deserve a good swift kick in the nuts.
As has been said a few times, we are in a pretty fuzzy area here with the only recent precedence being set following the 2008 recession; so ain't none of us can say for sure what your individual trustee is going to do. So, keep us posted.Chapter 13 (not 100%):- Burned: AMEX, Chase, Citi, Wells Fargo, and South County Bank cum Bank of Southern California
- Filed: 26-Feb-2015
- MoC: 01-Mar-2015
- 1st Payment (posted): 23-Mar-2015
- 60th Payment (posted): 07-Feb-2020
- Discharged: 04-Mar-2020
- Closed: 23-Jun-2020
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I don't even think that most Trustees went after the stimulus money. Just a few that are either 100% by the book, trying to make a name for themselves, or just cold-hearted; just my opinion.Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
-
It looks like everyone should wait to see what the stimulus package includes. There is money for people who have to apply for unemployment due to wage reduction or loss. The plan looks like people will receive the amount they would receive normally for unemployment plus up to an additional $600/week, so a filer could receive the full amount of pay that they are not receiving during temporary/full layoffs. This is for up to 4 months. I know the wording of this is being finalized. This could be helpful to people who are currently being effected by the situation.Filed Chapter 13 - 07/20/12
Discharged 8/2/16
Comment
-
sophieanne, LOL, "Hurry up and wait", just like when I was with Uncle Sam's Misguided Children back in the 1970s.Chapter 13 (not 100%):- Burned: AMEX, Chase, Citi, Wells Fargo, and South County Bank cum Bank of Southern California
- Filed: 26-Feb-2015
- MoC: 01-Mar-2015
- 1st Payment (posted): 23-Mar-2015
- 60th Payment (posted): 07-Feb-2020
- Discharged: 04-Mar-2020
- Closed: 23-Jun-2020
Comment
-
Looks like there is good news for those in BK because of the latest COVID-19 stimulus bill!
The Senate bill contains Section 1113 Bankruptcy. I uploaded both the latest version of the bill and plain English write up that could be a draft or two behind the bill. I copied the Plain English version below.
Section 1113. Bankruptcy
Amends the Small Business Reorganization Act to increase the eligibility threshold to file under subchapter V of chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to businesses with less than $7,500,000 of debt. The increase unsets (expires) after one year (law goes into effect) and the eligibility threshold returns to $2,725,625.
Amends the definition of income in the Bankruptcy Code for chapters 7 and 13 to exclude coronavirus-related payments from the federal government from being treated as “income” for purposes of filing bankruptcy. Sunsets (expires) after one year (law goes into effect).
Clarifies that the calculation of disposable income for purposes of confirming a chapter 13 plan shall not include coronavirus-related payments. Sunsets after one year.
Explicitly permits individuals and families currently in chapter 13 to seek payment plan modifications if they are experiencing a material financial hardship due to the coronavirus pandemic, including extending their payments for up to seven years after their initial plan payment was due. Sunsets after one year.
This is what is proposed and in the bill. Now it needs to be passed by Congress and signed into law. Would not be surprised if Elizabeth Warren worked this into the legislation.
Stay well and be well.Last edited by switch625; 03-25-2020, 06:02 PM.
Comment
-
We'll wait and see.Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
-
So far, it looks like the text is still in the bill passed by the senate. It removes the stimulus from the definition of "current monthly income" from not only section 101 which defines income, but also touches 1322 and 1325 which are related to Chapter 13 plans.Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by justbroke View PostSo far, it looks like the text is still in the bill passed by the senate. It removes the stimulus from the definition of "current monthly income" from not only section 101 which defines income, but also touches 1322 and 1325 which are related to Chapter 13 plans.
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment