For background on our case see “Our Story: The Beginning” in the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Forum
I think the biggest shock at the 341 meeting had nothing to do with our case. As we sat waiting, lawyers would enter the room or be out in the hall calling people’s names. These lawyers did not know their clients. Once the lawyer found his/her client, they would give the client a quick overview of the process and their case and had them sit down and wait. That took no more than 2 minutes. Then the lawyer would go to the next client. One lawyer had six clients and he did not know or recognize any of them as they entered the room. We went third so I did not get to see how it went for them.
In contrast, our lawyer had directed us to be in the cafeteria thirty minutes before the 341 meeting. He showed up on time and was fully prepared. He went over every aspect of our petition to be sure we were prepared. Noting that we were very nervous and stressed, he joke with us and made every effort to reassure us that it would all go smooth. We may have paid more for our lawyer than many others on this site, in part due to the complexity of our real estate holdings, but it was worth it to us to have him there ready to help us every step of the way.
The second shock was that the trustee had not read our petition. It looked like someone in his office had read it briefly and provided him with notes. He read the notes while we waited at the table and his assistant checked our identification against their records. His questions further confirmed that he was not familiar with our facts. I guess he has the next 60 days to review it and ask more questions.
A third shock was that the trustee never asked about the rents we were getting from our rental properties. After all that has been said on this forum and by our lawyer regarding the trustee’s right to the rents, we were pleasantly surprised that the trustee said nothing. We didn’t say anything either.
In the past, both of us have been involved in small civil matters and have been on juries. In each case, the lawyer made an effort to ensure it was clear regarding the subject he was questioning. He would state the subject of his questions and point to a document or page, if appropriate, before asking his question. In our case, the trustee just asked the question and we had to quickly figure out what he was talking about. His questions were very focused and precise with no background information. For the most part, we did OK but I stumbled on a couple answers and he was not happy. Fortunately, our lawyer covered for us and provided the response, which we then confirmed.
Our case was continued for a few weeks due to late breaking news from our CPA regarding our tax return for 2011. It seems the old CPA made some errors and we may owe back taxes. As part of our preparation for BK7 we had hired a new CPA that specializes in BK tax filing and real estate to help with our 2011 taxes. He just found the potential error while reviewing our 2010 tax return, both state and federal. There may be less 2011 tax refund for the trustee to take. Moral of the story, this should have been done sooner.
Even with the complexity of our petition and my stumbles, our 341 meeting lasted no more than 10 minutes. (No creditors showed.) It seemed like foorrrevvvverrrr but in reality, it was very brief. The first of the two cases in front of us took longer than ours due to the need for a translator.
Going forward, we need to get the CPA to provide us with revised estimates of the 2011 taxes and amend our petition. There is a chance that we may not have to meet with the trustee if he finds the amendments to be satisfactory.
For the next sixty days or so we will wait to see if he comes up with any more questions. Given that he had not read our petition, I have no idea if this BK will go smooth or not.
I think the biggest shock at the 341 meeting had nothing to do with our case. As we sat waiting, lawyers would enter the room or be out in the hall calling people’s names. These lawyers did not know their clients. Once the lawyer found his/her client, they would give the client a quick overview of the process and their case and had them sit down and wait. That took no more than 2 minutes. Then the lawyer would go to the next client. One lawyer had six clients and he did not know or recognize any of them as they entered the room. We went third so I did not get to see how it went for them.
In contrast, our lawyer had directed us to be in the cafeteria thirty minutes before the 341 meeting. He showed up on time and was fully prepared. He went over every aspect of our petition to be sure we were prepared. Noting that we were very nervous and stressed, he joke with us and made every effort to reassure us that it would all go smooth. We may have paid more for our lawyer than many others on this site, in part due to the complexity of our real estate holdings, but it was worth it to us to have him there ready to help us every step of the way.
The second shock was that the trustee had not read our petition. It looked like someone in his office had read it briefly and provided him with notes. He read the notes while we waited at the table and his assistant checked our identification against their records. His questions further confirmed that he was not familiar with our facts. I guess he has the next 60 days to review it and ask more questions.
A third shock was that the trustee never asked about the rents we were getting from our rental properties. After all that has been said on this forum and by our lawyer regarding the trustee’s right to the rents, we were pleasantly surprised that the trustee said nothing. We didn’t say anything either.
In the past, both of us have been involved in small civil matters and have been on juries. In each case, the lawyer made an effort to ensure it was clear regarding the subject he was questioning. He would state the subject of his questions and point to a document or page, if appropriate, before asking his question. In our case, the trustee just asked the question and we had to quickly figure out what he was talking about. His questions were very focused and precise with no background information. For the most part, we did OK but I stumbled on a couple answers and he was not happy. Fortunately, our lawyer covered for us and provided the response, which we then confirmed.
Our case was continued for a few weeks due to late breaking news from our CPA regarding our tax return for 2011. It seems the old CPA made some errors and we may owe back taxes. As part of our preparation for BK7 we had hired a new CPA that specializes in BK tax filing and real estate to help with our 2011 taxes. He just found the potential error while reviewing our 2010 tax return, both state and federal. There may be less 2011 tax refund for the trustee to take. Moral of the story, this should have been done sooner.
Even with the complexity of our petition and my stumbles, our 341 meeting lasted no more than 10 minutes. (No creditors showed.) It seemed like foorrrevvvverrrr but in reality, it was very brief. The first of the two cases in front of us took longer than ours due to the need for a translator.
Going forward, we need to get the CPA to provide us with revised estimates of the 2011 taxes and amend our petition. There is a chance that we may not have to meet with the trustee if he finds the amendments to be satisfactory.
For the next sixty days or so we will wait to see if he comes up with any more questions. Given that he had not read our petition, I have no idea if this BK will go smooth or not.
Comment