Very Easy!!!

[Ann]

All,
I have waited pretty close to a year to be able to finally have my chance to share my experience with my 341 meeting. Well the day finally came and went and I can say that for me it was very easy. We did sit in on a few before us and when it came to our turn we were at ease since we knew what questions were going to be asked. When we did have our chance to speak it was just so easy. I have to say that our trustee was without question very polite and in my opinion treated us with respect. I didn't feel like he was "looking down" on us at all. We were honest with our answers and we made sure we looked him straight in the eye at all times. I have to say there were a few who went before us that I honestly could not believe the nerve of them with their dishonesty to the trustee. One woman stated she had never filed for bankruptcy before when in fact the trustee's assistant brought it up that she did in deed file for bankruptcy back in 1999! One gentleman was trying to use the monthly payment on a home that had recently foreclosed! He was also unemployed but was using $1000 gas allowence on a car that he wasn't even traveling in at the time of filing. I can see why those that try to file for bankruptcy in an honest way must pay the price for those that are so dishonest by the way of being scrutinized by the trustee. All in all I'm very happy with the way my meeting went and only hope that those of you who are waiting for your 341 will go as smoothly as ours did. I so look forward to my discharge!

[epiphany]

Great news..happy for you!

ep

[ryan]

Yes, it seems like a cliche sometimes, but honesty is the best policy.

[tacomeat]

just reading through the 341s and i thought it was pretty ironic how you applauded the court for being so polite, while you went ahead and cast dispersions and judgments on them here (and without even knowing all the facts).

[Ann]

just reading through the 341s and i thought it was pretty ironic how you applauded the court for being so polite, while you went ahead and cast dispersions and judgments on them here (and without even knowing all the facts).

taco, if this was for me I surely have no clue as to what you are referring to. More importantly I don't care!!! I was doing what everyone does here on the forum...voicing my experience and if you don't like it so be it! My posting here did not warrant your negative feedback!

[tacomeat]

taco, if this was for me I surely have no clue as to what you are referring to. More importantly I don't care!!! I was doing what everyone does here on the forum...voicing my experience and if you don't like it so be it! My posting here did not warrant your negative feedback!

do you really need for me to parse this out for you?

sure, you relayed YOUR experience. great, that is much appreciated in a forum where so many people dont know what to expect (like me).

but you also not only ASSUMED/CONCLUDED the other people were LYING without knowing the facts, but then passed judgment on and disparaged those people based solely on your assumption ("the nerve of them with their dishonesty"). and you did this in the same paragraph where you praised the trustee for not "looking down" on people - while you went ahead and did just that yourself.

clearly there are A LOT of people who dont know what the rules of bk involve, whats allowed, whats not, what to say, what not to say, etc. one example - you know how bk's stay on your record for 10 years? well maybe that person who had a previous bk thought that 10 years was the cut off because at that point it falls of your record? so its completely possible she wasnt purposefully being dishonest (as you so quickly concluded in 2 minutes of seeing her case).

[BobWang]

All,
I I have to say there were a few who went before us that I honestly could not believe the nerve of them with their dishonesty to the trustee. One woman stated she had never filed for bankruptcy before when in fact the trustee's assistant brought it up that she did in deed file for bankruptcy back in 1999! One gentleman was trying to use the monthly payment on a home that had recently foreclosed! He was also unemployed but was using $1000 gas allowence on a car that he wasn't even traveling in at the time of filing. I can see why those that try to file for bankruptcy in an honest way must pay the price for those that are so dishonest by the way of being scrutinized by the trustee. A

Who are you to sit back and judge others in a difficult situation ???

[Ann]

Who are you to sit back and judge others in a difficult situation ???

Wow...you people really don't get it do you??? Obviously you had to be there and you weren't. No apologies going out here!

[BobWang]

Wow...you people really don't get it do you??? Obviously you had to be there and you weren't. No apologies going out here!

Get off your high horse.....You were in the same room for the same reasons as those other people were. One should not throw stones in a glass house....

[Ann]

Get off your high horse.....You were in the same room for the same reasons as those other people were. One should not throw stones in a glass house....

..Like I said no apologies here...enough said!!!!!

[BobWang]

..Like I said no apologies here...enough said!!!!!

Pathetic.......

[BobMango]

Pathetic.......

Well BobWang, in your posts on this forum so far you seem to be quite critical of others, yet have nothing of substance to contribute....

[BobWang]

Well BobWang, in your posts on this forum so far you seem to be quite critical of others, yet have nothing of substance to contribute....

Not really concerned about your opinion of me....

[lrprn]

Pathetic.......

Bob Wang, you're new here so I'm cutting you a break this time. One of our forum rules is not calling other members names. "Pathetic" is calling another member a name. This is your one warning. You've made seven posts so far and already several of them are unnecessarily confrontative. Continue on this path and you will be permanently banned.

As you've already been advised by Flamingo, if you don't like the content of a thread or post, then move on to one you do like. Just because the subject of a thread or post doesn't have value or relate to you doesn't mean it has no value and doesn't relate to others.

[BobWang]

Bob Wang, you're new here so I'm cutting you a break this time. One of our forum rules is not calling other members names. "Pathetic" is calling another member a name. This is your one warning. You've made seven posts so far and already several of them are unnecessarily confrontative. Continue on this path and you will be permanently banned.

As you've already been advised by Flamingo, if you don't like the content of a thread or post, then move on to one you do like. Just because the subject of a thread or post doesn't have value or relate to you doesn't mean it has no value and doesn't relate to others.

So should I bow down to your alter and thank my lucky stars that you are "cutting me a break" ????? Not gonna happen.... especially in the make believe world of the world wide web........