I figured that I would start some discussion here.
I am through getting my fresh start, and in time I will be starting some retirement accounts. At 39, it is definitely time to do this!
I will soon have a 401K at work, and it does have some match (up to $1000 per year), and I will be investing enough to get the match.
I will be putting enough after that to max a couple of IRAs, and then back to the 401K. This may take me a couple of years to get to this stage, but I will get there.
Here is the debate... Roth versus traditional. My income should qualify me for both. For those who don't know, a traditional IRA contribution is deducted from your taxable income, and you pay taxes on it when you withdraw it in the future.
A Roth IRA contribution is NOT deducted from your taxable income, so you pay taxes on it. However, all of the money, including the gains are tax free when you withdraw it.
Normally, most people will tell you that a Roth is a better deal. However, I am concerned about a politician seeing all of this tax free money out there, and saying that "we all need to make sacrifices," and imposing, taxes on the Roth deductions in the future.
In other words, is it better to take the tax break now, and invest that tax break, or to run the risk with a tax free Roth, that may not be tax free in 30 years? How many government policies are the same 30 years ago as they are today?
I am through getting my fresh start, and in time I will be starting some retirement accounts. At 39, it is definitely time to do this!
I will soon have a 401K at work, and it does have some match (up to $1000 per year), and I will be investing enough to get the match.
I will be putting enough after that to max a couple of IRAs, and then back to the 401K. This may take me a couple of years to get to this stage, but I will get there.
Here is the debate... Roth versus traditional. My income should qualify me for both. For those who don't know, a traditional IRA contribution is deducted from your taxable income, and you pay taxes on it when you withdraw it in the future.
A Roth IRA contribution is NOT deducted from your taxable income, so you pay taxes on it. However, all of the money, including the gains are tax free when you withdraw it.
Normally, most people will tell you that a Roth is a better deal. However, I am concerned about a politician seeing all of this tax free money out there, and saying that "we all need to make sacrifices," and imposing, taxes on the Roth deductions in the future.
In other words, is it better to take the tax break now, and invest that tax break, or to run the risk with a tax free Roth, that may not be tax free in 30 years? How many government policies are the same 30 years ago as they are today?
Comment