I sent out a dozen dispute letters, one for my husband to the co. he financed his student loans through.
The guy responded promptly w/ a letter basically stating they are under no violation for reporting a 30 day late (4 times in one month because that's how the loan is set up, mind you) during the bankruptcy.
I spoke with him today and he's actually being very nice and understanding. He does take the stance that they are perfectly fine to do this and it's not a violation of the Automatic Stay (saying he's 100% confident) but admitted he is not as up on the FCRA.
We filed BK in Oct. 05, which is the month they reported the 30 day late, although after month after that they've been reporting correctly. He thinks the 30 day was reported because the meeting w/ the creditors had not happened yet, therefore their system reported correctly.
He is willing to make any necessary changes if I can prove they are in violation.
Any ideas? If they are, can I get the exact statute and/or law so I can show him it? Like I said, he's being really good about this (which is not like most people) and wants to help if they are in the wrong.
Thanks for your feedback!
P.S- Just because this is a student loan (federal) doesn't exclude them from the Automatic Stay and FCRA laws, correct?
The guy responded promptly w/ a letter basically stating they are under no violation for reporting a 30 day late (4 times in one month because that's how the loan is set up, mind you) during the bankruptcy.
I spoke with him today and he's actually being very nice and understanding. He does take the stance that they are perfectly fine to do this and it's not a violation of the Automatic Stay (saying he's 100% confident) but admitted he is not as up on the FCRA.
We filed BK in Oct. 05, which is the month they reported the 30 day late, although after month after that they've been reporting correctly. He thinks the 30 day was reported because the meeting w/ the creditors had not happened yet, therefore their system reported correctly.
He is willing to make any necessary changes if I can prove they are in violation.
Any ideas? If they are, can I get the exact statute and/or law so I can show him it? Like I said, he's being really good about this (which is not like most people) and wants to help if they are in the wrong.
Thanks for your feedback!
P.S- Just because this is a student loan (federal) doesn't exclude them from the Automatic Stay and FCRA laws, correct?
Comment