Let me preface this by saying that I understand filing BK is a huge deal from a financial perspective. I also know that you are seen as a high risk from this point on until all traces of it drop from your credit report. But I also believe creditors are not exercising common sense when it comes to a lot of underwriting practices.
My rant is this: I wanted to buy some electronics from a local Best Buy store. They have an offer for a few months interest-free financing so I thought I'd use it. I can pay cash for these toys but if you can finance something over time for free then why not? So I decided to apply for a Best Buy credit/store card. I get the "Under review" message and when I do get a decision in about an hour it's a denial.
I was honestly quite shocked. Why? Because HSBC used to issue this card and it's now owned by Capital One. Sure I did BK both of these about 4 years ago but since then have both an Orchard (HSBC) and Capital One Platinum card (each with about $1500 credit limits) that I have had a perfect history with for the past 3 years.
Since the BK I've doubled my income to just under $200k, acquired over $30k in new credit lines, maintained an under 10% DTI, and have not made a late payment. But even with this profile I still don't qualify for a little store card?
I called them to ask for reconsideration and they acknowledged that they see I have perfect history with them for the past three years, but their system will kick out anyone who has IIBed their accounts. Since each store makes their own rules that is why I get different criteria.
I was blown away by this because it does seem to lack some common sense. I am a much better risk now then I was when I got the original two cards that were IIBed. But I guess rules are rules and I didn't fit their idea of the perfect date.
The good news is, I still got the electronic toys I wanted but just elected to pay cash for them. So I guess in a way the story has a happy ending but I just wanted to publicly air my grievance.
My rant is this: I wanted to buy some electronics from a local Best Buy store. They have an offer for a few months interest-free financing so I thought I'd use it. I can pay cash for these toys but if you can finance something over time for free then why not? So I decided to apply for a Best Buy credit/store card. I get the "Under review" message and when I do get a decision in about an hour it's a denial.
I was honestly quite shocked. Why? Because HSBC used to issue this card and it's now owned by Capital One. Sure I did BK both of these about 4 years ago but since then have both an Orchard (HSBC) and Capital One Platinum card (each with about $1500 credit limits) that I have had a perfect history with for the past 3 years.
Since the BK I've doubled my income to just under $200k, acquired over $30k in new credit lines, maintained an under 10% DTI, and have not made a late payment. But even with this profile I still don't qualify for a little store card?
I called them to ask for reconsideration and they acknowledged that they see I have perfect history with them for the past three years, but their system will kick out anyone who has IIBed their accounts. Since each store makes their own rules that is why I get different criteria.
I was blown away by this because it does seem to lack some common sense. I am a much better risk now then I was when I got the original two cards that were IIBed. But I guess rules are rules and I didn't fit their idea of the perfect date.
The good news is, I still got the electronic toys I wanted but just elected to pay cash for them. So I guess in a way the story has a happy ending but I just wanted to publicly air my grievance.
Comment